Colonel: Cuts could affect most civilians at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio
DAYTON, Ohio — A military leader at Ohio's largest military installation says most civilian workers at the southwest Ohio base are likely to lose pay if anticipated Defense spending cuts go into effect.
The commander of the 88th Air Base Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton says fewer than 100 of the base's 13,000 civilian employees are likely to escape furloughs if the cuts occur, the Dayton Daily News and WHIO-TV reported.
Col. Cassie Barlow says fewer people on the job could mean shorter operational hours, and some patients seeking treatment in Wright-Patterson Medical Center might be sent to other hospitals if the center is short staffed.
The spending cuts are scheduled to start automatically March 1 if Congress and President Obama fail to avert them.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said most of the military's 800,000-employee civilian workers could be forced to take unpaid time off if the cuts are not averted.
Any Wright-Patterson furloughs are expected to be one day a week for 22 weeks, with employees receiving a 30-day notice next month, Barlow said.
Employees such as medical personnel and firefighters could avoid forced unpaid time off.
Civilian workers' benefits such as health care and life insurance won't be affected, but “the real issue is that they'll have 20 percent less salary,” Barlow said.
The loss in wages for Department of Defense workers furloughed in Ohio has been projected to be up to about $167 million, with most of that at Wright-Patterson, according to Barlow.
“The real estate agent, the car salesman, the local bank, the local restaurant, the malls, all of those places will see an effect, I believe, of those lost wages,” she said.
The base will hold town hall meetings on the issue and answer employee questions through a hotline and a website.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Clinton: Women ‘expect’ extremism from terrorists, not GOP candidates
- US economy surged at 3.7 percent rate in April-June quarter
- Virginia reporter, cameraman killed on air; gunman also dies
- Kraft Heinz recalls more than 2M pounds of turkey bacon
- Affordable Care Act ‘Cadillace tax’ may prompt employers to trim health benefits
- U.S. Embassy to Japan used private emails, watchdog finds
- Dow, S&P, Nasdaq soar 4% despite China worries, but volatility expected to endure
- Mexico institutes border checks
- Hawaii coral reefs under observation as dangerous bleaching expected again soon
- Legality of Planned Parenthood cuts disputed
- Abandoned Chicago railway reborn as Bloomingdale Trail