Kerry shows clear divergence from Obama on foreign affairs
WASHINGTON — John Kerry opened his diplomatic mission to Syria in 2009 with a decidedly undiplomatic question for President Bashar Assad: Why do so few Arab leaders trust the Syrian leader?
One month into President Obama's first term, the then-chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was in Damascus to explore the possibility of Syrian-Israeli peace talks. But minutes into their meeting, Kerry pressed the Syrian autocrat to explain why other Middle Eastern rulers said Assad always “says one thing and does another ... or he says he will do something, then doesn't do it?”
Assad, clearly startled by the question, demanded examples.
“I need to know this,” he said, according to a State Department memo later disclosed by Wiki-Leaks.
Kerry has made it clear he wants to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, a long and sporadic process that most recently collapsed during Obama's first term. He is well-aware that failed attempts tarnished the reputations of elder statesmen and presidents for decades, including Obama.
He is not deterred.
“We need to try to find a way forward,” Kerry said at his Senate confirmation hearing last month.
Yet Kerry and Obama have sharply different attitudes and approaches to foreign crises. The differences raise questions, if not doubts, about how far Kerry can go to achieve a diplomatic breakthrough.
Kerry is driven by a desire for a diplomatic success in the Middle East. Obama is chiefly focused on winding down America's wars overseas and preventing other conflicts from spreading.
Daniel C. Kurtzer, who served as U.S. ambassador to Israel and Egypt, interprets Obama's high-profile trip and other White House signals as “a cautionary approval” for Kerry to try again on restarting talks.
Obama is “saying let's be careful, so if there is no opportunity here we won't be too exposed,” said Kurtzer, now at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Prince-ton University.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- AG vows to help better Baltimore police
- Federal appeals court flips on cell location records ruling in Florida
- VA probe ‘for show,’ cardiologist claims
- 56 years later, Ohio fugitive captured in Florida
- Texas attack called ‘textbook’ lone-wolf case
- Familiarity guides Obama’s picks to lead Joint Chiefs
- State AGs lambaste climate proposal, predicting higher electricity prices, job losses
- First, ‘Watson’ wins ‘Jeopardy’; now, he helps treat cancer
- $5.6B in education tax credits dubious
- Researchers find new, elusive bird species
- Accused Texas gunman was former target of FBI terror probe