Sen. McCain: Hagel 'not qualified' for Defense secretary job
WASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain said Chuck Hagel is not fit to run the Pentagon while predicting that the former lawmaker will receive a Senate vote, barring further disclosures about his past statements.
“I do not believe that Chuck Hagel, who is a friend of mine, is qualified to be secretary of Defense,” McCain, R-Ariz., said on CNN's “State of the Union” program on Sunday.
Democrats, who have a majority in the Senate, scheduled a vote for Tuesday on Hagel's confirmation.
McCain said on NBC's “Meet the Press” program last week that Hagel “will probably have the votes necessary” to win confirmation.
Hagel, 66, a Nebraska Republican who served two terms in the Senate, has met challenges from members of his party because of his past opposition to unilateral sanctions against Iran, his comment in 2006 about the influence of what he called “the Jewish lobby” and his statements against the U.S. troop buildup in 2007 that hastened the end of the Iraq war.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., questioned whether Hagel could be effective, given that at least 35 Republicans are still expected to vote against him.
Some Republicans pushed to delay consideration of Hagel's nomination, partly to press the Obama administration for more information about its response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on U.S. missions in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
McCain, asked about the possibility that he would put a “hold” on the nomination of John Brennan to become director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said he is seeking information from the nominee about the Benghazi attack as well as his position on the interrogation technique known as “waterboarding.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.