TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Obama asks court to nix gay unions ban

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:27 p.m.

WASHINGTON — In a historic argument for gay rights, President Obama on Thursday urged the Supreme Court to overturn California's same-sex marriage ban and turn a skeptical eye on similar prohibitions across the country.

The Obama administration's friend-of-the-court brief marked the first time a president has urged the high court to expand the right of gays and lesbians to wed. The filing unequivocally calls on the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8 ballot measure, although it stops short of the soaring rhetoric on marriage equality Obama expressed in his inaugural address in January.

California is one of eight states that give gay couples all the benefits of marriage through civil unions or domestic partnership but don't allow them to wed. The brief argues that in granting same-sex couples those rights, California has acknowledged that gay relationships bear the same hallmarks as straight ones.

“They establish homes and lives together, support each other financially, share the joys and burdens of raising children, and provide care through illness and comfort at the moment of death,” the White House wrote.

Obama's position, if adopted by the court, likely would result in gay marriage becoming legal in the seven other states: Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island.

In the longer term, the administration urges the justices to subject laws that discriminate on sexual orientation to more rigorous review than usual, a standard that would imperil other state bans on same-sex marriage.

The brief marks the president's most expansive view of gay marriage and signals that he is moving away from his previous assertion that states should determine their own marriage laws. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, signed off on the administration's legal argument last week after lengthy discussions with Attorney General Eric Holder and Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

In a statement after the filing, Holder said “the government seeks to vindicate the defining constitutional ideal of equal treatment under the law.”

Friend-of-the-court briefs are not legally binding. But the government's opinion in particular could carry some weight with the justices when they hear oral arguments in the case March 26.

Despite the potentially wide-ranging implications of the administration's brief, it still falls short of what gay rights advocates and the attorneys who will argue against Proposition 8 had hoped for. Those parties had pressed the president to urge the Supreme Court not only to overturn California's ban, but to declare all gay marriage bans unconstitutional.

Still, marriage equality advocates welcomed the president's positioning.

“President Obama and the solicitor general have taken another historic step forward consistent with the great civil rights battles of our nation's history,” said Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign and co-founder of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, which brought the legal challenge to Proposition 8.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Obama administration delays decision on Keystone XL pipeline
  2. Colorado deaths stoke marijuana worries
  3. Medicaid paid $12M for Illinois dead, audit finds
  4. Iranian envoy officially blocked by law
  5. Judge strikes down Minnesota’s anti-coal law as unconstitutional
  6. Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
  7. Grandmother left vengeful note in boys’ slayings, then committed suicide, police say
  8. U.S. devised ‘Cuban Twitter’ for political dissent
  9. Android systems running 4.1.1 softward carry Heartbleed bug
  10. Social Security drops debts older than 10 years
  11. GOP will tackle ‘war on women’; Allegheny County targeted
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.