$85B in automatic spending cuts set to start as Congress fails to act
By McClatchy Newspapers
Published: Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 9:54 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Sometime on Friday, the federal government will take the first step toward cutting spending in dozens of departments and programs as each of the two major parties tried and failed to muscle partisan alternatives through the Senate.
With the last-minute effort to avert the automatic spending cuts failing, the House adjourned, the Senate wrapped up its scheduled business for the week, and most members went home.
That raised the stakes for a meeting in the White House with President Obama and the leaders of both parties in Congress as they debate how or whether they can change course in the days ahead as the spending cuts take effect over time.
“Tomorrow I will bring together leaders from both parties to discuss a path forward,” Obama said after the congressional votes failed.
“As a nation, we can't keep lurching from one manufactured crisis to another,” he said. “Middle-class families can't keep paying the price for dysfunction in Washington. We can build on the over $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction we've already achieved, but doing so will require Republicans to compromise.
“That's how our democracy works, and that's what the American people deserve.”
With Congress gone, even a last-minute breakthrough agreement that no one expects likely would come too late to stop the first moves to start cutting $85 billion from this year's $3.5 trillion budget.
Sometime before midnight — the 2011 law requiring the cuts stipulated only that they start going into effect on March 1 — Obama is expected to sign a directive ordering the White House Office of Management and Budget to start putting the cuts into effect.
With much of the federal budget such as Social Security off limits, the cuts will be concentrated on a smaller part of the government, split evenly between defense and non-defense programs. Many will take weeks or even months to go into effect.
The 2011 law set the automatic cuts to force Congress and Obama to come up with a more palatable alternative to curb deficits by $1.2 trillion over 10 years.
Democrats insisted on adding tax increases and smaller spending cuts. Republicans insisted that it all be done with spending cuts. That's where they ended up again on Thursday in the Senate.
Democrats proposed curbing projected deficits with a minimum 30 percent tax on millionaires, the closing of tax loopholes and spending cuts to military and farm programs.
Republicans proposed keeping the same amount of spending cuts but giving Obama flexibility in how the cuts are implemented.
“What we're about to go through is in some respects a charade because we know that the proposal on that (Democratic) side will not succeed with 60 votes,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “The proposal on this side will not succeed with 60 votes. Meanwhile, the clock moves on until sometime tomorrow night.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tea Party flap averted fraud probe by IRS, Justice, emails show
- AC/DC not disbanding, lead singer Brian Johnson says
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- US Airways’ pornographic tweet won’t cost anyone a job
- Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
- Vermont Senate OKs GMO labels as industry insists genetically modified crops are safe
- Nevada standoff over cattle ends as feds back down
- Census director defends changes, denies questions altered to inflate Obamacare success
- Supreme Court voids overall contribution limits to political candidates
- Android systems running 4.1.1 softward carry Heartbleed bug
- Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located