100 to head to Arlington for USS Monitor crewmen's burial
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, March 2, 2013, 5:51 p.m.
RICHMOND, Va. — A century and a half after the USS Monitor sank, the interment of two unknown crewmen found in the Civil War ironclad's turret is bringing together people from across the country with distant but powerful ties to those who died aboard.
The ceremony on Friday in Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia will include Monitor kin who believe the two sailors — whose remains were discovered in 2002 — are their ancestors, despite DNA testing that has failed to make a conclusive link. But the families stress that the interment pays homage to all 16 Union sailors who died when the ship went down, and nearly 100 people from Maine to California are expected to attend.
“When I learned they were going to do a memorial and have the burial at Arlington, it was like, ‘I can't miss that,'” said Andy Bryan of Holden, Maine, who will travel with his daughter Margaret to the capital. He said DNA testing found a 50 percent likelihood that Monitor crewman William Bryan, his great-great-great-uncle, was one of the two found in the summer of 2002, when the 150-ton turret was raised from the ocean floor off Cape Hatteras, N.C.
“If it's not William Bryan, I'm OK with that,” Bryan said. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime thing, and I feel like I should be there.”
The same holds true for Diana Rambo of Fresno, Calif. She said her mother, Jane Nicklis Rowland, was told of the ceremony for Monitor crewman Jacob Nicklis a week before her death in December at 90. He was Rowland's great-uncle. That, Rambo said, makes the interment especially poignant.
Rambo, too, suspects Nicklis was one of the two in the turret. “We know he was on the ship,” she said. “We know he was one of the 16.”
Two weeks ago, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said the two probably would be the last Navy personnel from the Civil War to be buried in Arlington. He plans to speak at the interment.
“It's important we honor these brave men and all they represent as we reflect upon the significant role Monitor and her crew had in setting the course of our modern Navy,” Mabus said.
The ceremony is scheduled on the 151st anniversary of the Battle of Hampton Roads. On March 8, 1862, the Brooklyn-made Monitor fought the CSS Virginia in the first battle between two ironclads. The Virginia, built on the carcass of the U.S. Navy frigate USS Merrimack, was the Confederate answer to the Union's ironclad ships. The two-day battle ended in a draw.
The Monitor sank about nine months later in rough seas southeast of Cape Hatteras while under tow by the USS Rhode Island. Dubbed a “cheese box on a raft,” the Monitor was not designed for rough water. Sixteen of the Monitor's 62 crew members died. The crew of the Rhode Island was able to rescue about 50 people. Most of the dead were lost at sea. The wreck was discovered in 1973.
Retired Navy Capt. Barbara “Bobbie” Scholley was commanding officer of the team of about 40 divers who descended to the Monitor wreck in 2002. The turret was upside down and filled with coal, sand and silt that had hardened into a solid mass. Divers chipped away until the turret could be lifted.
“We knew there was a good chance we would find sailors in the turret because they would escape that way,” said Scholley, who will travel from her home in Annapolis for the Arlington ceremony.
“I think everybody realized, yes, this is a piece of history, but it's more than that,” Scholley said of the mood among divers, archaeologists and others on a support barge when the remains were found. “These are men who fought for us and died for us, and here they are and we're bringing them home. It was very powerful.”
The turret has gone through restoration and is on display at the USS Monitor Center of The Mariners' Museum in Newport News, Va.
Meanwhile, in a longshot bid to identify the remains, the skulls of the sailors found in the turret were used to reconstruct their faces about a year ago.
Some families whose ancestors had served on the Monitor came forward — including Rambo's mother and Bryan — but DNA testing did not produce a conclusive match.
Some are confident their detective work has sealed the family links to the two men found in the turret.
Gaydee Gardner, Rambo's sister, said it's surreal to know “I am a blood relative to Jacob ... a 21-year-old kid off to sea on the first ironclad, whose president was Abraham Lincoln.” She will travel from Rancho Mirage, Calif., for the ceremony in memory of “a kid who must have been terrified during his final hours.”
Bryan said the Navy is sending a DNA kit to a maternal descendant in Australia in hopes of cementing the link with William Bryan.
“The more I've learned about him, the more I'm attached,” said Bryan, who will join 20 family members in Washington. “It doesn't hurt that my father was William Bryan, so that always makes it feel that it's pretty personal.”
The remains were sent to the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command in Hawaii. They concluded the sailors were white, each was 5-foot-7, and one was 17 to 24 years old while the other was in his 30s. They narrowed the possibilities to six among the 16 Monitor sailors who died.
Forensic anthropologist Robert Mann said the command has not given up hope and is conducting more DNA testing. Genealogists have been able to determine possible descendants for 10 families of the missing 16 sailors.
While efforts to identify the two continue, “let's lay the men to rest,” said David Alberg, superintendent of the Monitor sanctuary.
Alberg — along with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Maritime Heritage Program and descendants of the surviving Monitor crew members — has pushed for the Arlington honors.
“It's their final voyage,” Alberg said. “They sailed out in 1862 and never made it home, and now they're finally being laid to rest 150 years later.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Senator wants fast action on rail safety
- ‘Drug czar’ cleared to lead Border Patrol
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Ads tell Colo. pot users to keep off roads
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Mummified remains found in foreclosed home