Website stands by story on Menendez, prostitutes
By The Washington Post
Published: Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 9:24 p.m.
WASHINGTON — The Daily Caller website said on Tuesday that a Dominican woman who says she was paid to fabricate claims that she had sex with Sen. Robert Menendez was not one of the two prostitutes the outlet interviewed for a story about the New Jersey Democrat.
According to affidavits filed in a Dominican court, an escort who said in a video that Menendez paid her for sex has told authorities that she was instead paid to make her statement and has never met or seen the senator.
“That woman was not one of the two prostitutes The DC interviewed for a Nov. 1 report,” the Daily Caller reported.
The videotaped claims of two women, made with their faces obscured, were posted on the conservative website last fall. The site reported at the time that “the two women said they met Menendez around Easter at Casa de Campo, an expensive 7,000-acre resort in the Dominican Republic. ... They claimed Menendez agreed to pay them $500 for sex acts, but in the end, they each received only $100.”
On Tuesday, the Daily Caller said that the woman who submitted the affidavit in a Dominican court cannot be one of the women they interviewed, in part because the names don't match. The affidavit was given by a woman who used the name Nexis de los Santos Santana, and the website said neither woman it interviewed used that name. The website also said that the escort's reported age of 23 does not match, because both women interviewed by the Daily Caller said they were 24.
Santana and an attorney who says he paid her are seeking immunity in the Dominican Republic from charges of slander. They said another lawyer misled them into helping build a smear campaign against Menendez.
ABC News reported that Santana and two other women had been interviewed back to back last fall by ABC and the Daily Caller. Anonymous operatives arranged the appearances, the network said in an article posted on its website.
ABC News said it did not broadcast the interviews or initially report on their claims “because of doubts about the women's veracity and identity.”
In her interview with ABC News, Santana — who at the time gave her name as Michelle Rodriguez — said she had come forward with the allegations against Menendez because he had paid her only $100, not $500 as she had expected, according to the network's report. Santana said in her affidavit that she had been told to fabricate that claim.
FBI agents conducting interviews in the Dominican Republic have found no evidence to back up allegations, initially made by an anonymous tipster, that Menendez had patronized prostitutes, according to two people briefed on their work.
Menendez has denied the prostitution claims, saying they were made by enemies trying to undermine him as he sought re-election last fall.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Feds curtail paper applications for health care law
- Americans move toward better health
- Wind-power companies won’t face federal prosecution in eagle deaths
- Budget deal reverses $63B in cuts, excludes extension of jobless benefits
- 2 inmates of Gitmo sent home amid fears
- Dems to overlook probe of nominee
- Car hits deer, which flies into jogger
- Mid-Atlantic storm makes driving hazardous
- Air pollution measures due in court
- ‘Walking Dead’ actress guilty of sending ricin letters
- Teen found with dead fetus heads toward trial on shoplifting charges