By The Los Angeles Times

Published: Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 8:36 p.m.
Updated: Friday, March 8, 2013

WASHINGTON — What began as Rand Paul's one-man crusade to press the Obama administration for clarity regarding its prosecution of Americans suspected of terrorist ties became a bipartisan spectacle in the Senate chamber on Wednesday, one that delayed a vote on the president's choice for CIA director.

Senate leaders had said they could hold a vote on John Brennan's nomination as soon as Wednesday evening, barely 24 hours after a lopsided vote in favor of the choice in the Intelligence Committee. But shortly before noon Paul, R-Ky., began a rare “talking filibuster” and vowed to continue speaking until the White House answered whether it would rule out targeted killings of American citizens within the United States.

“I have allowed the president to pick his appointees, but I will not sit quietly and let him shred the Constitution,” he said, noting he voted for President Obama's nominees to lead the State and Defense departments. “I cannot sit at my desk quietly and let the president say he will kill Americans on American soil who are not actively attacking the country.”

Five hours into the discourse, a frustrated Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sought to interrupt Paul and proceed to a vote after a final hour's worth of debate. Paul rejected the request.

“We're through for the night,” Reid said in response, before Paul resumed his filibuster.

Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said he would seek action on Brennan's nomination as early as Thursday and no later than Saturday.

Paul had spoken for three hours uninterrupted before other Republicans came to the floor to give him a brief respite by asking him to yield for questions. It allowed Paul to remain in control of the debate, though he remained standing, at times sipping water from a glass on his front-row desk, farthest right in the Senate chamber.

Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Marco Rubio of Florida joined the discussion. Another, Ted Cruz of Texas, compared Paul to the heroes of the Battle of the Alamo, which ended March 6, 1836.

A Democrat, Ron Wyden of Oregon, also came to the floor to say he supported Paul's effort for greater oversight of the administration's efforts. He had voted to support Brennan's nomination in committee the day before.

“He will be a principled and effective leader that the CIA needs and deserves. And I think Sen. Paul and I agree that this nomination also provides a very important opportunity for the United States Senate to consider the government's rules and policies on targeting killings of Americans,” Wyden said.

“What it comes down to is, every American has the right to know when their government believes that it is allowed to kill them.”

Rubio, too, had voted for Brennan a day before, and maintained after leaving the Senate floor Wednesday that he continued to support him.

“The issue's not Brennan. The issue is whether members of the Senate have the right to ask relevant, significant and important public policy questions and get a direct answer from this administration,” said Rubio, a potential rival of Paul's in a 2016 Republican presidential nomination fight. “This is not in defense of Sen. Paul, this is in defense of the institution and of its right to do its job by having relevant information given to them.”

Under Rule XIX of the Senate, senators who have been recognized to speak may do so for as long as they wish and cannot be forced to cede the floor or even be interrupted without their consent, according to the Congressional Research Service.

That was traditionally how a filibuster was conducted, but that notion has changed. Instead, a filibuster now describes any procedural move by a Senate minority to block or delay consideration of legislation or appointments, and a senator is not required to take the floor to speak.

Such was the case earlier in the day when 40 Republican senators voted to block one of Obama's appointees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The last time a talking filibuster occurred was in December 2010, when Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., spoke for all but 80 minutes in a nearly nine-hour period to oppose a compromise to extend the George W. Bush-era tax rates.

After more than 51⁄2 hours, Paul confessed that he was losing steam.

“I can't ultimately stop the nomination, but I can bring attention to this (cause),” he said.

1. Powerball officials: 80 percent of number combinations picked
2. Big and scary asteroid will luckily just make a flyby
3. ‘Anti-gay’ shooting fatality stuns NYC
4. Amid debris of tornado-ravaged Texas town, ‘miracle’ dog found
5. Republicans see IRS scandal parallel in EPA info requests
6. Background checks ongoing fight for NRA
7. Rare Sargent painting coming to NYC auction
8. Logging suspected in giant wildfire
9. Obama picks budget official to run troubled IRS
10. Drones threat to civil liberties, Congress told
11. Boston will assess police response to bombings

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.