Senators get tough on straw purchases
By USA Today
Published: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 8:48 p.m.
WASHINGTON — The first gun-related legislation passed out of a key Senate committee on Thursday, setting up the first potential floor votes on the issue of gun violence in nearly a decade.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11-7 to approve the bill, which would crack down on straw purchasers of weapons by making the practice a federal crime.
One Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, joined the panel's 10 Democrats in voting for the bill.
In his comments before the vote, Grassley said bill wasn't perfect, but “good faith” negotiations between himself, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., made him inclined to support the bill out of committee.
“Some on my side believe the bill needs more work to resolve outstanding issues between now and when the bill goes to the floor,” he said. “That is something that I hope will happen with the chairman's help.”
President Obama called the approval “real progress” and urged passage by the full Senate and the House. “We need to stop the flow of illegal guns to criminals,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Too few pilots or too little pay?
- Ovary removal aids women at high risk of cancer
- Obama budget to do little on national debt
- Shutdown cost national parks at least $414M
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Senator wants fast action on rail safety
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Censure of Issa fails as Dems blast actions at IRS hearing
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program