GOP senator: NASA broke law by not disclosing visit by Chinese
WASHINGTON — A congressman said NASA broke a national security law last year by failing to notify Congress about two visits that Chinese officials made to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., said the visits — one in June and one in December — were barred by a measure he authored in 2011 requiring NASA facilities such as Kennedy to give lawmakers at least 14 days notice before hosting “official Chinese visitors.”
“We say, ‘Let us know. Notify us.' And they did not,” Wolf said at a Capitol Hill news conference. “I do believe that was a violation of the law.”
The visits to Kennedy are part of what Wolf calls a troubling pattern of security lapses at NASA centers.
On Thursday, Wolf said his office has given FBI officials and federal prosecutors material from a whistle-blower at NASA Langley Research Center in Virginia “involving a Chinese national who was allegedly provided access and information he should have otherwise been restricted from receiving.”
Wolf chairs the House Appropriations subcommittee that funds NASA. He's been one of the loudest critics of China in Congress.
Wolf does not want the United States to work with what he's called an “evil” government. He said the White House has bypassed his 2011 national security measure by using federal money to pay for joint space and technology ventures with China.
Last month, Wolf and Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, wrote to FBI Director Robert Mueller expressing concerns about the possible leak of sensitive technological information to China from NASA's Ames Research Center in California.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.