Anti-violence bill for women signed into law
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 7:54 p.m.
WASHINGTON — President Obama on Thursday signed into law the Violence Against Women Act, formally ending a battle fought in Congress during the last year over controversial changes to the act.
In a public ceremony in Washington, Obama said this year's legislation expands an act that has altered the culture surrounding domestic violence in America. The bill extends federal aid to gay, immigrant and tribal victims, while adding services for its original beneficiaries and a large voting bloc: women.
Accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden, who first introduced the act as a senator 19 years ago, Obama emphasized the bill's new services.
“We'll expand them to cover even more women, because this is a country where everybody should be able to pursue their own measure of happiness and live their lives free from fear, no matter who you are, no matter who you love,” Obama said.
The Senate passed the bill on a bipartisan 78-22 vote. The House passed it 286-138. White House support for legislation that originated in the Senate was made clear at an early stage.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Deputy accused of illegal stops
- Accuser takes stand during court-martial
- Miranda read to sex assault accuser, 14
- Spyware in government computers ‘has Russian paw prints all over it’
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- Nuke plant safety improving, watchdog says — with cautions
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Kansas public school funding unconstitutional
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Border Patrol ordered to stop shooting at vehicles
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping