Bin Laden son-in-law caught; NYC trial likely
By The Washington Post
Published: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 8:24 p.m.
A former spokesman for al-Qaida and son-in-law of its founder, Osama bin Laden, was captured overseas and secretly brought to New York this month to face a criminal trial for allegedly conspiring to kill Americans, U.S. officials said on Thursday.
Sulaiman Abu Ghaith was detained in Turkey last month but was taken into U.S. custody in Jordan while he was in the process of being deported to Kuwait, according to American officials. He is expected to appear in federal court on Friday in the Southern District of New York.
“It has been 13 years since Abu Ghaith allegedly worked alongside Osama bin Laden in his campaign of terror, and 13 years since he allegedly took to the public airwaves, exhorting others to embrace al-Qaida's cause and warning of more terrorist attacks like the mass murder of 9/11,” Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said after the indictment against Abu Ghaith was unsealed. “Today's action is the latest example of our commitment to capturing and punishing enemies of the United States, no matter how long it takes.”
Abu Ghaith, believed to be in his late 50s, was part of al-Qaida's inner circle before 9/11 and cemented his ties to the terrorist network's leader by marrying bin Laden's oldest daughter, Fatima. In videos and statements posted on websites, he celebrated the success of the strikes on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and warned that al-Qaida was entitled to kill millions of Americans and employ chemical and biological weapons.
“The storms shall not stop, especially the airplanes storm,” Abu Ghaith said after the attacks, according to the indictment. He advised Muslims, children and opponents of the United States “not to board any aircraft and not to live in high rises.”
Abu Ghaith will become the closest relative of bin Laden — who was killed nearly two years ago by U.S. commandos in Pakistan — to face trial in an American court. The case marks a rare instance during the Obama administration in which a senior terrorism suspect has been captured overseas and taken into custody rather than killed.
U.S. officials said Abu Ghaith was part of a group of al-Qaida operatives who had taken refuge in Iran, adding that he could prove to be a source of intelligence on that cell's routing of money and recruits to the terrorist network's base in Pakistan.
The decision to bring Abu Ghaith, a native of Kuwait, to New York reignited the debate over the disposition of al-Qaida suspects, with senior Republicans in Congress denouncing the decision to try him in a civilian criminal court rather than a military commission at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement that “al-Qaida leaders captured on the battlefield should not be brought to the United States to stand trial.” Saying that U.S. courts are “not the appropriate venue,” Rogers said Obama should “send any captured al-Qaida members to Guantanamo.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- Spyware in government computers ‘has Russian paw prints all over it’
- Deputy accused of illegal stops
- Border Patrol ordered to stop shooting at vehicles
- Kansas public school funding unconstitutional
- Nuke plant safety improving, watchdog says — with cautions
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Miranda read to sex assault accuser, 14
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Economists explain why Fed’s taper could spark market meltdown
- Accuser takes stand during court-martial