McCain demands answers on illegals
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, March 8, 2013, 7:48 p.m.
PHOENIX — Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona said on Friday that some of the more than 2,000 illegal immigrants recently released by the Homeland Security Department because of budget cuts may have been convicted of serious crimes, citing “local sources.”
In a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, McCain demanded new information on the release of the detainees, who were facing deportation, including the details of their criminal records.
The senator said there's a possibility some of them had committed serious crimes such as smuggling, narcotics trafficking and child molestation.
Federal officials maintain those released were nonviolent criminals and low-risk offenders. The states in which immigrants were freed include Arizona, California, Georgia and Texas.
McCain wants Napolitano to make public the criteria used to determine which detainees were released and how many had been convicted of serious crimes.
He also raised questions about whether budget cuts have prompted Border Patrol agents to quickly release newly detained illegal immigrants.
McCain requested answers by March 18.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Del Taco customers mistakenly charged thousands for fast-food meals
- Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
- Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid
- IRS, other agencies award contracts to license plate tracking company
- Scientists achieve cloning advance for use in treating diseases
- Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- Mauling puts bears back on firing line in Central Florida
- Washington’s snowy owl recovers from apparent bus crash, returns to wild