EPA fails to tighten lead standards
The Environmental Protection Agency has no plans to revise key hazard standards that protect children from lead poisoning, despite calls for action from the agency's own scientific advisers.
The result is that children will continue to be exposed to lead particles in house dust and yard soil at levels that can cause reduced intelligence, attention disorders and other health problems, because the EPA's standards — set in 2001 — give a false sense of safety, scientists and child health advocates said.
“It's outrageous we aren't acting on what we know,” said Howard Mielke, a Tulane University soil contamination expert.
A year ago, the EPA's Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee called for the agency's “immediate and urgent attention” to several recommendations on lead poisoning issues, including revising lead dust standards.
Yet any change in the EPA's lead standard for house dust, which is under agency review because of a 2009 citizen petition, appears to be years away and would likely face opposition from the home renovation and real estate industries, which have raised concerns in the past about increased costs, EPA records indicate.
The EPA said that no action is being taken to revise the soil hazard standard — which allows five times more lead in play areas than what modeling by the state of California shows is needed to protect children from losing 1 I.Q. point.
“EPA has a longstanding commitment to reducing childhood lead poisoning,” the agency said in a statement, calling the existing soil standard effective.
The EPA's standards for dust and soil are widely used as safety benchmarks when older homes are inspected for lead paint residue and when yards and playgrounds have their soil tested for contamination. “They matter to consumers as a right-to-know issue: If you're told your home is safe and in fact it's not,” said Rebecca Morley of the National Center for Healthy Housing.
In the 12 years since the EPA set its standards, research has shown even tiny amounts of lead harm children.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Immigrants warned of increase in scams
- Tough Texas gets prison results by going softer on crime
- Some in Congress turn down retirement pension, but many cash in
- Study touts benefits of full-day preschool
- Kahlo’s workplace to be reimagined in New York Botanical Garden
- Justices consider social media, free speech
- With no indictment, chaos fills Ferguson streets
- McCarthy-era felon: Lies doomed me
- Oregon police dog fired from job
- Ferguson angles to avoid fate of riot-torn cities
- Test vaccine to fight Ebola promising