Senate Dems' budget dooms Obama projects
WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats are preparing a catchall government funding bill that denies President Obama money for implementing signature first-term accomplishments such as new regulations on Wall Street and his expansion of government health care subsidies but provides modest additional funding for domestic priorities such as health research.
The measure is the product of bipartisan negotiations and is the legislative vehicle to fund the day-to-day operations of government through Sept. 30 — and prevent a government shutdown when the funding authorization runs out March 27.
Passage in the Senate this week would presage an end to a mostly-overlooked battle between House Republicans and Obama and his Senate Democratic allies over the annual spending bills required to fund federal agency operations.
Washington is girding for weeks of warfare over the budget for next year and beyond as House and Senate Budget Committees this week take up blueprints for the upcoming 2014 budget year.
The first salvo in that battle is coming from House Republicans poised to release on Tuesday a now-familiar budget featuring gestures to block “Obama-care,” turn Medicare into a voucher-like program for retirees and sharply curb Medicaid and domestic agency budgets. Such ideas are dead on arrival with Obama and Democrats controlling the Senate, but will — in concert with taxes on the wealthy enacted in January — allow Republicans to propose a budget that would come to balance within 10 years.
“We think we owe the American people a balanced budget,” House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said on “Fox News Sunday.”
Senate Democrats are countering on Wednesday with a budget plan mixing tax increases, cuts to the Pentagon and relatively modest cuts to domestic programs. The measure would not reach balance, but it would undo automatic budget cuts that started taking effect this month and largely leaves alone rapidly growing benefit programs such as Medicare.
“We need to make sure that everybody participates in getting us to a budget that deals with our debt and our deficit responsibly,” said Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash.
Obama's budget proposal is weeks overdue, and Press Secretary Jay Carney deflected questions about it Monday, other than to promise that it would “for a period of time” bring deficits below 3 percent of gross domestic product, a measure that many analysts say is sustainable without damaging the economy.
The wrap-up spending bill for the half-completed fiscal year released Monday, however, is another matter. It's a lowest-common-denominator approach that gives the Pentagon much-sought relief for readiness accounts but adds money sought by Democrats such as Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., for domestic programs such as Head Start, health research, transportation and housing.
Mikulski needs GOP votes to pass the measure through the Senate, which Democrats control with 55 votes but where 60 votes are required for virtually every piece of substantive legislation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mom charged in girl’s death in line for $1M from her trust fund
- New heart failure drug works much better than current treatment, study finds
- Rosa Parks’ apartment in Montgomery, Ala., hit by copper-seeking thieves
- University of Wisconsin researchers work to customize vegetables for specific uses
- Border Patrol agent opens fire on armed militia member in Texas
- Astronomers get look at birth of huge galaxy
- Pilot in Atlantic Ocean crash lost consciousness, Coast Guard says
- Cleveland welcomes server farms