Winter was warmer, wetter than average
By USA Today
Published: Monday, March 11, 2013, 7:36 p.m.
The winter of 2012-13 was warmer and wetter than average, according to data released on Monday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Meteorological winter is considered to be the months of December, January and February.
The average temperature for the contiguous United States during the winter season was 34.3 degrees, which is 1.9 degrees above the 20th-century average, marking the 20th-warmest winter on record, NOAA reported.
As for precipitation, while the Southeast and Upper Midwest were wetter than average, much of the West was quite dry, especially in January and February, contributing to below-average snowpack in the Sierra and Rockies.
“Drought conditions continued to plague much of the Great Plains and West,” according to NOAA.
So far this year, California is enduring its driest year on record. NOAA reports that San Francisco has recorded only 1.82 inches of rain, which is the fifth-driest January-February on record in the city.
National weather records go back to 1895.
Winter was warmer than average for every state east of the Rockies. The warmest states were along the East Coast. Florida, Delaware and Vermont each had one of their 10-warmest winters on record.
Conversely, the Southwest was cooler than average, while near-average winter temperatures were reported in the Northwest.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Geminid meteor shower takes the stage
- Dems to overlook probe of nominee
- Navy deems drone launch from submarine success
- Pearl Harbor survivor keeps story alive
- GOP unlikely to block ban on plastic guns
- House Republicans signal support for budget deal
- New camouflage Army uniform nowhere to be seen
- Ohio boy shot by mom’s ex-boyfriend dies
- Former Boston crime boss Bulger’s jewelry, clothes could go to auction
- Rockwell smashes record for American art
- Rockwell smashes record for American art auctions