Share This Page

Judge rules two Steubenville football stars delinquent

| Sunday, March 17, 2013, 12:45 p.m.
Defense attorney Walter Madison, right, holds his client, 16-year-old Ma'lik Richmond, as Judge Thomas Lipps rules that he's delinquent on rape and other charges on Sunday, March 17, 2013, in Steubenville, Ohio.
REUTERS
Trent Mays (left) weeps as the verdict against him is read on Sunday, March 17, 2013, in the juvenile court in Steubenville, Ohio. Mays, 17, and Ma'lik Richmond, 16, high school football players, were found guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl during a party last summer.
Trent Mays, 17, returns after a recess for the night session of his trial during the third day of Mays' and Richmond's trial on rape charges in juvenile court on Friday, March 15, 2013, in Steubenville, Ohio.
REUTERS
Ma'lik Richmond enters juvenile court in Steubenville, Ohio, on Friday March 15, 2013. Richmond was found guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl at a party last summer while she was in a drunken stupor in a case that gained national exposure through social media.

STEUBENVILLE, Ohio — Through four days of graphic testimony, two high school football stars accused of rape showed no emotion even as witnesses and evidence — including an unfiltered stream of obscene text messages and photos — laid out how the boys sexually assaulted an intoxicated, unresponsive 16-year-old girl.

That changed when a juvenile judge found the boys delinquent, the juvenile court equivalent of a guilty verdict. Trent Mays, 17, and Ma'lik Richmond, 16, broke into tears and sobbed on the shoulders of their attorneys as family members wailed in the gallery.

At one point, Richmond rose and walked toward the victim's mother. He sobbed and said he was sorry.

“I know you are,” the victim's mother said. “I forgive you.”

Visiting Judge Thomas Lipps, a retired Hamilton County Juvenile Court judge, sentenced Mays to a minimum of two years in a juvenile facility and Richmond to at least one year. The state cannot hold them past their 21st birthdays.

The ruling occurred on the fifth day of a trial that roiled a community and revealed shocking evidence.

Prosecutors said the girl — who lives across the Ohio River in Weirton, W.Va. — was so drunk that she did not remember the boys sexually assaulting her, once in the back of a car while a friend recorded video, and once on the floor of a basement while other teens watched and took photos that they later texted to each other.

Mays and Richmond raped the girl when she could barely move — let alone resist — making her “the perfect victim,” state prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter said.

The Tribune-Review does not identify sexual assault victims.

Defense attorneys painted a different picture. They said the girl had a reputation for lying and drinking heavily, and that she was “all over” the defendants during a party. They said she never lost consciousness or the ability to make decisions.

Lipps disagreed.

He called the evidence “profane and ugly.” He urged the boys to take seriously treatments they will receive in custody so they might “take this experience and grow upon it.”

In short statements to the court, Mays and Richmond apologized to the victim and her family. They stayed in the courtroom for several minutes after the ruling, weeping and hugging family members.

Grand jury not done

More charges could be filed.

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said a grand jury will convene on April 15 to determine whether charges such as tampering with evidence and failure to report a crime or child abuse should be filed.

During testimony, prosecutors read a text message Mays sent a friend, saying that his football coach, Steubenville High School's legendary Reno Saccoccia, had intervened when rumors of a rape started spreading and somehow “took care of it.” DeWine said that, under state law, coaches are required to report such allegations.

Saccoccia could not be reached for comment.

The case sparked international outrage in the fall when the “hacktivist” group Anonymous published incendiary evidence online, including a photo of the suspects carrying the girl by her ankles and wrists and a 12-minute video of a Steubenville High baseball player joking about the rape and calling the girl “dead.”

The group also published the victim's name when it leaked a sealed transcript from a probable cause hearing but failed to redact her name.

Hemmeter said Anonymous changed the dynamics of the trial, with good and bad results.

Anonymous drew attention to the case, which helped spread word about sexual assault and what constitutes rape, she said. But the group's actions thrust the girl — who was humiliated when the naked photos of her spread online — into an uncomfortable and unwanted spotlight, she said.

“There might be some good (from Anonymous's involvement), but it happened on the back of a 16-year-old girl,” she said.

The victim, who had a crush on Mays, the quarterback, before that night in August, did not attend the sentencing.

“She needs some time,”' said Bob Fitzsimmons, attorney for the victim's family. “She's always felt bad for the boys. This little girl didn't want to hurt anybody.”

He said she is attending school full time, made the honor roll and is again playing soccer.

Troubling details

The victim went to a party on Aug. 11 that was attended by dozens of teens, many of them drinking. She got drunk, left the party with Mays and Richmond, then blacked out.

Her memory returned in the morning, when she awoke on a couch in a basement, naked and confused. She quickly put on her pants, bra and shirt, but could not find her underwear, cell phone, earrings or shoes, she testified.

“It was really scary,” she said. “I was embarrassed and scared, and I honestly did not know what to think because I couldn't remember anything.”

In the days that followed, rumors spread through town, driven by videos and photos of the naked girl.

Mays sent the victim a series of texts. In one, he admitted taking a photo of the girl while she was naked, with his semen on her body. In another, he urged her not to get police involved.

“I'm truly sorry. I'm just trying not to go to court or jail, this is just stupid,” he wrote. “Please don't let them file charges, like I can't deal with that.”

He lamented to the victim that the rumors might get him kicked off the football team. She responded: “The more you bring up football, the more pissed I get because that shows that's all you care about.”

In a town of 19,000 residents, Steubenville High's successful and popular “Big Red” football team draws 10,000 spectators to games on fall Friday nights. Activists and bloggers said the team is so popular that police and city officials tried to brush aside the rumors because it involved two stars of the team. Officials denied a cover-up.

Protesters wearing masks gathered outside the justice center throughout the trial and returned for the verdict. They said they were pleased with the verdict but would not be satisfied until the “rape culture” is eradicated, in Steubenville and beyond.

“We're not going anywhere,” said one masked protester, who identified himself as AnonymousSphere. “That's the thing about us, we wear masks. We could be anywhere. You never know.”

Chris Togneri is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

Related Content
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.