Before-and-after moon pictures show deliberate crash hardly dented the landscape
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, March 19, 2013, 7:00 p.m.
LOS ANGELES — When NASA's twin spacecraft Ebb and Flow crashed into the moon last year, scientists did not count on seeing the aftermath.
On Tuesday, the space agency released before-and-after pictures of the lunar north pole, where Ebb and Flow came to rest. Months after the back-to-back, mission-ending dives, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter flew over the crash sites and imaged the final resting spots.
Ebb and Flow broke into smithereens upon impact, and pinpointing the small craters they carved was difficult, said Arizona State University researcher Mark Robinson, who operates the orbiter's camera.
Even the mission's chief scientist, Maria Zuber, was surprised when she saw the impact sites, which looked like dots.
“I was expecting to see skid tracks,” said Zuber of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ebb and Flow deliberately plunged into a lunar mountain in December after mapping the moon's gravity field in unprecedented detail. The location was chosen because it was far away from the Apollo landings and other historic sites.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fearful experiences passed on in mice families, study finds
- Satanists want to build monument
- Air Force allegedly uses spy system of cadet informants to counter misconduct
- Negotiators polish cease-fire budget proposal
- 44,000 Cuban migrants arrive in U.S. in fiscal year ’13
- Gun permit tiff puts officials’ jobs in danger
- Seizure of nuns fuels Syrian Christians’ fears
- Maine WCTU chapter takes low-key approach to abstinence
- Mid-Atlantic storm makes driving hazardous
- McDonald’s breakfast order brings side of cash
- FBI’s elite surveillance team trying to find ‘Mo’