Attorney General Holder averts furloughs of federal prison staffers
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric Holder says he has averted daily furloughs of 3,570 federal prison staffers across the country, moving $150 million from other Justice Department accounts to stave off a serious threat to the lives and safety of correctional staffers, inmates and the public.
Some 38,000 employees at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons supervise 176,000 inmates in 119 institutions, ensuring security and providing prisoners with needed programs.
In a memo on Friday to Justice Department employees, Holder said that congressional passage of a spending bill keeping the government open through the end of September provides no relief from $1.6 billion in Justice Department budget reductions that took effect.
The attorney general's memo did not say which department agencies were tapped for the $150 million.
Holder said the cuts still raise serious issues.
“I am deeply troubled by the impact the sequester will have on the department's capacity to prevent terrorism, combat violent crime, partner with states and local law enforcement agencies and protect the judiciary and our most vulnerable citizens,” Holder wrote.
“I am still evaluating whether we have the ability to avoid other furloughs in the department this year,” he added, addressing concerns of department employees. “I will do all that I can to minimize the impact of these events on your lives.”
The attorney general said moving the $150 million can protect prison facilities through the end of the fiscal year in September, but it does not resolve “serious life and safety issues” the Bureau of Prisons faces next year.
Holder said his department has required extensive cuts to travel, training, contracts and other accounts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Biden decries voting restrictions in NAACP address
- Judge: Feds wrong to list bearded seals
- Cornyn, Cuellar tout border bill amid uncertainty
- U.S. coal exports undermine clean air efforts, experts say
- Met Museum of Art president to retire
- Move over, Mickey, here comes Crayola