Share This Page

Utah miner killed in roof fall could not evade death twice

| Saturday, March 23, 2013, 8:54 p.m.

Elam Jones came close to death in a central Utah mine accident once before. He was preparing to begin his shift in the Crandall Canyon mine in August 2007 when a cave-in struck the section where he was to have worked, killing six miners and three rescuers.

The 28-year-old coal miner was not so lucky on Friday. A tunnel roof collapsed in the Rhino Mine about 10 miles west of Huntington, killing him and sending a co-worker to the hospital.

Even though the earlier accident occurred only a few miles away, Jones loved his job and did not view it as particularly dangerous, said his mother, Julie Jones, a Huntington city councilwoman.

“He loved the mine he was at and the men he worked with. They were family,” she said on Saturday. “He always said he could get hit going to Salt Lake and get killed in a car wreck.”

Jones also was a member of the ill-fated rescue team at the Crandall Canyon mine. Three rescuers died while trying to save the trapped miners. He later spoke at a vigil for those who died or were injured there.

“He told me that he had to be there. Those were his buddies,” his mother said.

A father of two young children, Jones' roots in coal mining went back four generations on his mother's side and three generations on his father's side. His father works for a nearby coal mine.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.