1st female director of Secret Service named
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Tuesday, March 26, 2013, 7:06 p.m.
WASHINGTON — President Obama on Tuesday named a high-ranking career employee of the Secret Service to become its first female director.
Julia A. Pierson, a veteran of the agency's Miami and Orlando field offices, is chief of staff of the law enforcement agency that is best known for protecting the president.
The agency Pierson will head has more than 150 offices throughout the United States and abroad. Established to combat counterfeiting of U.S. currency, the agency protects national and visiting foreign leaders, secures national sites and events, and conducts related criminal investigations.
In announcing her appointment, Obama cited Pierson's 30 years of experience with the Secret Service and her leadership roles in protective operations, human resources and training.
“Julia is eminently qualified to lead the agency that not only safeguards Americans at major events and secures our financial system, but also protects our leaders and our first families, including my own,” Obama said.
As Obama puts together his team for the second term, Pierson is the first woman he has appointed to head a national security agency. Obama faced some criticism when he named men to head three of the most high-profile departments: the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA.
He has, however, named a number of female appointees, including Sally Jewell to head the Interior Department, Gina McCarthy to be the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Mary Jo White to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission and Sylvia Mathews Burwell to be director of the Office of Management and Budget. And Pierson will answer to Janet Napolitano, who is staying on as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Senator: CIA improperly searched computer network
- Obama hams it up for health care on Funny or Die
- Snowden captivates tech crowd
- D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal ‘shadow campaign’
- Lanza’s father says he wishes son was never born
- Deaths from heroin, pain pills called ‘urgent,’ growing’ crisis
- Depth, distance reduce impact of quake off California’s northern coast
- Parents of ‘spoiled’ teen urge her to return home
- Fannie, Freddie profits surprise
- General’s court-martial is thrown into jeopardy
- Climate contraptions get real consideration