Police: Man put anti-hyperactivity pill in Easter egg
DAPHNE, Ala. — Police in Daphne say a 21-year-old man has been charged with disorderly conduct because a child ate an Adderall pill hidden in an Easter egg.
Authorities say Jarret Helm was arrested because a 6-year-old ate medication he said was accidentally hidden in a plastic egg. The egg was mixed among 1,500 others at a church's egg hunt on Sunday. Adderall is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and has side effects similar to amphetamines.
Police told AL.com that the child who ate the pill was not injured. Mary Mullen, a church spokeswoman, says the volunteer told organizers about the mix-up before the event, but the hunt went on because he thought he retrieved the egg that contained the medication.
Helm is being held in the Daphne jail, and it is unclear whether he has an attorney. Police said he may be facing up to a year in prison.
“He claimed it was an accident. Primarily the charge will stem from his actions after that. He didn't do enough to recover the egg that had the medication in it and get rid of it,” said Cpl. Jason Vannoy with the Daphne Police Department's Investigation Unit.
Vannoy said they've questioned Helm at length and believe that there was only one egg with medication. However, Christ the King church is asking that the eggs be returned as a precaution.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.