Nev. lawmaker sets record: expulsion
CARSON CITY, Nev. — A Nevada assemblyman whose erratic behavior dominated headlines for weeks will go down in history as the first lawmaker expelled from the state Legislature by his peers.
In a somber, emotional hearing, the Nevada Assembly voted Thursday to oust Democrat Steven Brooks. Several members were heard crying.
Fellow Democrat and Assembly Majority Leader William Horne said people no longer felt safe with him in the legislative building.
“How dare they?” Brooks said in a brief telephone interview immediately after the voice vote. “I've been convicted of nothing.”
Brooks alleged that unspecified opponents have tried to kill him. He didn't take questions.
“Yes, tried to kill me,” he said. “I'm an open book. They won't let me testify at the Grant Sawyer Building, and they sent 100 police officers to arrest me.”
“Let me ask you, how can they do that?” Brooks added before hanging up.
Brooks lawyer, Mitchell Posin, said he is “disappointed” and surprised, “especially because I was recently told it wasn't going to be heard today.”
Posin said he would discuss with Brooks their next step.
Brooks was arrested twice since January and is accused of making threats toward his colleagues, including Assembly Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick.
Last month, Brooks was denied the purchase of a gun after he was banished from the chambers. His lawyer said Thursday there's been a misunderstanding and that Brooks doesn't pose any threat to anyone.
Brooks, 41, won re-election in the Nov. 6 general election by a 2-to-1 margin over an unknown challenger.
He first was arrested Jan. 19 in a car with a gun and dozens of rounds of ammunition after allegedly voicing a threat against Kirkpatrick, a fellow North Las Vegas Democrat. The state attorney general's office is handling that case, and no formal charges have yet been filed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fissures begin to emerge among Dems
- Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg has stent placed in heart artery
- Boston airport’s ‘naked man’ remains behind bars
- Fewer adults smoking, U.S. survey finds
- Obama’s immigration actions neglect business pleas
- National Guard reinforcements contain damage in Ferguson
- Many older people silently harbor gene mutation that could start them on the path to blood cancer
- Obama administration announces plan to limit smog-forming ozone
- House ethics panel defers campaign finance investigation of New York Rep. Grimm
- Test vaccine to fight Ebola promising
- Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg has surgery for coronary blockage