Pipeline spills forces Utah governor to act; Chevron warned
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, March 28, 2013, 9:18 p.m.
SALT LAKE CITY — A series of spills from ruptured pipelines operated by Chevron Corp. has Utah's governor calling for more oversight.
Gov. Gary Herbert left no doubt about his displeasure on Thursday when asked about the latest spill at a monthly televised news conference. He said the federal agency responsible for interstate pipelines isn't doing its job and that Utah will step up its own efforts to ensure pipeline safety.
The pipeline ruptured last week at Willard Bay State Park, spilling diesel fuel into marshes. It was Chevron's third pipeline leak in Utah in the last three years.
Another pipeline leak sent crude oil rushing down into a Salt Lake City creek in 2010. Months later, the same pipeline ruptured again.
Each pipeline leak involved a spill of 21,000 or more gallons of crude oil or fuel.
“If anything's been disappointing in the past couple of weeks, it's been this Chevron oil spill,” Herbert said. “This is just not acceptable. We need to take a more proactive stance.”
Herbert said his state departments of commerce and environmental quality are looking to hold Chevron more accountable.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mauling puts bears back on firing line in Central Florida
- Del Taco customers mistakenly charged thousands for fast-food meals
- Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’