3 killed in 95-vehicle pileup in Virginia
By The Associated Press
Published: Sunday, March 31, 2013, 8:51 p.m.
GALAX, Va. — Nearly 100 vehicles crashed on Sunday along a mountainous, foggy stretch of interstate near the Virginia-North Carolina border, killing three people and injuring 25 others.
Police said traffic on Interstate 77 in southwest Virginia backed up for about 8 miles in the southbound lanes. Authorities closed the northbound lanes so firetrucks, ambulances and police could get to the series of chain-reaction wrecks.
Virginia State Police determined there were 17 separate crashes involving 95 vehicles within a mile span near the base of Fancy Gap Mountain, spokeswoman Corinne Geller said.
The crashes began about 1:15 p.m. Sunday when there was heavy fog in the area.
“This mountain is notorious for fog banks. They have advance signs warning people. But the problem is people are seeing well, and suddenly they're in a fog bank,” said Glen Sage of the American Red Cross.
Overhead message boards had warned drivers since 6 a.m. to slow because of the fog, Geller said. The crashes were mostly caused by drivers going too fast for conditions.
At the epicenter was a wreck involving up to eight vehicles, some of which caught fire, Geller said.
School buses took stranded people to shelters and hotels.
Authorities reopened the northbound lanes on Sunday night.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 2 NYC buildings collapse in explosion; 1 dead
- Attack cat to receive medical treatment, therapy
- Lerner emails looked for way out of difficulties at the IRS
- Mo. man freed in editor’s death sues for $100M
- Floodwaters fall in Montana, Wyoming
- Prostitution found to have vast economic impact
- FDA approves migraine treatment device
- Nominee to head NSA leery of delays inherent in 3rd-party collection of telephone data
- CIA accused of meddling in torture probe
- 5th Amendment cited in N.J. bridge inquiry
- General gets OK to pursue plea deal