Obama to name Caroline Kennedy as ambassador to Japan
By Bloomberg News
Published: Monday, April 1, 2013, 7:03 p.m.
WASHINGTON — President Obama plans to name Caroline Kennedy, the daughter of the late President John F. Kennedy, as the next U.S. ambassador to Japan, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The vetting of Kennedy by the White House is almost complete, CNN reported. An early supporter of Obama in 2008, the 55-year-old Kennedy has agreed to the posting and the president has settled on her as his choice, but an announcement isn't expected until later this month, said the person, who requested anonymity.
By replacing Ambassador John Roos, a technology lawyer and Obama campaign donor, as the envoy in Tokyo, she would be a high-profile pick in a post that has been filled by Walter F. Mondale, the ex-vice president, and Mike Mansfield, a Senate majority leader.
A co-chair of Obama's 2012 campaign, Kennedy is one of several Obama political supporters and donors being reviewed for ambassadorships to top allies. Obama has drawn envoys from the political ranks at a higher rate than the historical average of 30 percent, according to the American Foreign Service Association. In his first term, Obama nominated 59 ambassadors, including 40 fundraising bundlers, who lacked experience in the diplomatic corps.
Matthew Barzun, finance chairman of Obama's 2012 campaign, is the leading candidate to be ambassador to the Court of St. James in London, according to the source.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
- Vermont Senate OKs GMO labels as industry insists genetically modified crops are safe
- Tea Party flap averted fraud probe by IRS, Justice, emails show
- Hoax bomb case causes concerns in Boston
- Federal judge strikes down North Dakota abortion ban
- ‘Godfather’ of runaway salaries for elected officials sentenced in California
- US Airways’ pornographic tweet won’t cost anyone a job
- New York Police Department commissioner disarms post-9/11 intel program
- Bloomberg to spend$50M on gun-control initiative
- Census director defends changes, denies questions altered to inflate Obamacare success