Obama steps up fundraising drive with stops in Denver, San Francisco
President Obama, eager to revive his stalled gun-control agenda, will tour a Denver police academy on Wednesday to put public pressure on his political opponents. In the evening, the president will make a private appeal to a more exclusive gathering at the San Francisco mansion of billionaire Gordon Getty.
The evening festivities are part of a two-day Western swing by Obama, arranged foremost as a return of the Democrats' No. 1 fundraiser to the money trail five months after Obama won his final election.
The dinner at the Getty home, along with three other high-dollar receptions in the Bay Area, are the first of 14 events the president will headline this year to help fill the coffers of the Democratic Party well in advance of the 2014 midterm elections. In addition, he is expected to raise money this year for Organizing for Action, his former campaign apparatus that has morphed into a “social justice organization” dedicated to advancing Obama's legislative agenda.
It is a robust pace for a president sworn into office just over two months ago, but Obama and his advisers believe the investment is crucial in an era when both parties are increasingly engaged in round-the-clock campaigning.
After raising a record $1.1 billion for his re-election, the president is involved in a behind-the-scenes effort to win back the House and hold on to the Senate next year.
“He's going to be raising money to try to elect people who he believes share his agenda and his priorities,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said this week.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Federal officials: Dallas nurse free of Ebola
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
- Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
- Man shot from behind, Wecht’s autopsy finds
- Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
- Court: IRS not targeting conservative tax-exempt groups
- Defacements in national parks lead to outrage, probe
- White House may enhance security
- Missouri officials faulted by feds for ‘selective’ probe in police shooting death
- Internet providers asked not to take ‘fast lanes’