Survival rates for smokers who have colon cancer less than for non-smokers
Published: Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
NEW YORK — Smokers are less likely to live and be cancer-free three years after having colon cancer surgery than people who never smoked, according to a new study.
Out of nearly 2,000 people who had part of their colon surgically removed, researchers found that 74 percent of those who never smoked were cancer-free three years later, compared to 70 percent of smokers.
Amanda Phipps, the study's lead author from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, said the results provide another reason why people should quit smoking.
“It's nice when you have findings that portray a consistent public health message,” Phipps said.
According to the American Cancer Society, certain ingredients in cigarettes can dissolve into a person's saliva and cause colon and other cancers.
The ACS estimates about 102,500 Americans will be diagnosed with colon and rectal cancers this year — and more than 40,000 will die from those diseases.
Phipps and her colleagues previously found smokers with colon cancer were more likely to die than non-smokers from any cause and specifically from their cancers. But the researchers wanted to take a closer look at how smoking affects coloncancer recurrence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kansas public school funding unconstitutional
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- Nuke plant safety improving, watchdog says — with cautions
- Deputy accused of illegal stops
- Border Patrol ordered to stop shooting at vehicles
- Miranda read to sex assault accuser, 14
- Traffic cameras rejected in Ohio ruling
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- 2014 midterm races to test Tea Party’s power to last
- Boy’s finger pistol brings suspension, debate
- Actor dies quick 1,000 deaths