Conn. adopts new gun control law
HARTFORD, Conn. — Gov. Dannel Malloy signed into law sweeping new restrictions on weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines on Thursday in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, a bipartisan deal that gun control proponents hope will spark action in Washington and state legislatures across the country.
Just four months ago, the governor broke the news to shocked parents that their children had been slaughtered in the Newtown school. Four of those parents joined him as he signed the bill into law during a somber ceremony at the state Capitol, his act giving Connecticut some of the toughest gun control laws in the country.
Malloy hugged each of the parents and gave them a pen he used to sign the bill.
“We have come together in a way that relatively few places in our nation have demonstrated an ability to do,” he said.
Since the Dec. 14 shooting in which 20 children and six educators were killed, some of their family members have become accidental gun control advocates, pressing for both tougher state and federal laws.
“This is a path I never thought my life would take. But working to save the lives of others is one way that I can honor Dylan's life,” said Nicole Hockley, referring to her 6-year-old son who was killed at Sandy Hook. “We want Newtown to be known not for our tragedy but for transformation.”
Malloy said he's become friends with some of the parents and promised to keep working with them to enact further law changes that address gun violence.
“Today does not mark the end of our efforts,” Malloy said.
Malloy and gun control advocates said they hope the new law, crafted by legislative leaders from both parties during several weeks of negotiations, coupled with President Obama's planned visit to the state Monday, will spur action in Washington.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Colorado clinic shooting suspect talked of baby parts, police say
- Police officer killed in Colorado Spring clinic rampage a co-pastor, figure skater
- Slow-moving, wintry storm packs punch in Plains, Midwest
- Police union stands by Chicago officer charged with murdering teen
- Investors buy shares in college students: Purdue University thinks it’s wave of future
- Federal $1.1 trillion spending bill loaded with policy deals
- Authorization for NSA dragnets of phone call data expires
- Chicago retail district targeted by protesters
- Disability claim waits grow alongside swelling caseloads for judges
- Pot doctors in medical marijuana states push boundaries with marketing
- Prof proposes museum of corruption in New York capital