Majority of Americans favor legal marijuana, poll finds
By McClatchy Newspapers
Published: Friday, April 5, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
WASHINGTON — Five months after Washington state and Colorado voted to legalize marijuana for recreational use, a poll released on Thursday finds that a majority of Americans agree and say it should not be illegal to smoke the drug.
And as Attorney General Eric Holder tries to figure out how to respond to the new legalization laws, the poll has more good news for voters in the two states: Sixty percent of Americans say the government should not enforce federal drug laws in any state that has voted to legalize pot.
The poll finds a strong consensus among people of all political persuasions for the federal government not to intervene: 64 percent of those who identified as independents, 59 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of Republicans.
Overall, 52 percent of Americans say marijuana should be legal, while 45 percent say it should remain illegal, according to the poll conducted in mid-March by the Pew Research Center.
The center said the results mark the first time in more than four decades of polling on the issue that legalized marijuana won majority support.
More Americans are experimenting with marijuana, too, the poll finds.
Forty percent said they had smoked the drug, compared with 38 percent a decade ago. And the poll finds a sharp decline in the percentage of Americans who believe that marijuana is a “gateway” drug that leads users to try other, harder drugs such as cocaine.
The poll finds that 50 percent of baby boomers back legalized marijuana, compared with only 17 percent of boomers in 1990.
But it's mainly younger Americans who are propelling the drive to legalize the drug, with 65 percent of adults born since 1980 — now between the ages of 18 and 32 —known collectively as the Millennial Generation, backing the idea. That compares with 36 percent for the same age group five years ago.
The poll finds that support for legalizing marijuana rose by 11 points among all age groups since 2010. That's a huge change since a 1969 Gallup survey found only 12 percent backing legalized marijuana, while 84 percent were opposed.
Another Gallup poll in December found 48 percent of Americans backing legalized pot, while 50 percent were opposed to the idea.
Reacting to Thursday's Pew poll, Steve Fox, national political director for the Marijuana Policy Project in Washington, said marijuana prohibition “is a policy without a rational basis and without public support.”
“These results do not just represent a tipping point,” he said. With support for legalization among people younger than 50 at close to 60 percent, he said, “this is more like the tip of the iceberg. Elected officials across the country need to listen to the people.”
Washington state and Colorado officials are proceeding with plans to open recreational dispensaries this year, but both are awaiting a formal response from Holder on whether the federal government will try to stop them.
Holder is under fierce pressure from both sides, with marijuana opponents urging him to uphold the federal statutes and block the states from proceeding, while proponents want the Obama administration to stay out of the way.
Holder has given no indication of how he will rule. But he told the Senate Judiciary Committee early last month that he would release an opinion soon.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Washington’s snowy owl recovers from apparent bus crash, returns to wild
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- IRS, other agencies award contracts to license plate tracking company
- Gun rights to return to Supreme Court’s agenda
- High court ruling sets off race for bigger campaign donations
- Tax Day’s a big deal ... only if you owe Uncle Sam
- Authorities say they have trove of evidence against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in Boston Marathon bombing
- Unruly man on jet diverted to Omaha charged