Scientists to rally against budget cuts
WASHINGTON — To the ranks of civil rights and anti-war activists who've marched on Washington, get ready to add white-frocked scientists.
Thousands of prominent cancer and other medical researchers will rally in the nation's capital on Monday to protest federal funding cuts that began several years ago and were accelerated by additional forced reductions beginning to take effect under the congressionally mandated process of sequestration.
“It's really come on top of a fairly extended period of flat funding, which has eroded the purchasing power of biomedical dollars,” said Roy A. Jensen, director of the University of Kansas Cancer Center, who will join the demonstration. “It's almost like the final push over the edge. I know a lot of labs are having to lay people off and not pursuing promising scientific leads.”
Influential scientists say the United States has fallen to 10th place in medical research spending as a percentage of its total economy at a time when China, Britain, Singapore, India and other countries are increasing their investments. They say the pace of breakthroughs in lifesaving treatment of cancer, HIV/AIDS and other major diseases will be slowed unless the decline is reversed.
“The cuts in federal funding as they're being put into play are unraveling one of the greatest biomedical research enterprises in the history of the world,” said Edward J. Benz Jr., head of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, which is affiliated with Harvard Medical School. “These kinds of draconian, across-the-board cuts are really cutting into the meat of what we do.”
The rally is being organized by the American Association for Cancer Research, which on Monday morning will suspend its annual convention in Washington and ask 15,000 attendees to gather outside the Carnegie Library at Mount Vernon Square, about a dozen blocks from both the White House and the Capitol. Busloads of scientists from New York, Pennsylvania and other states are expected to join the demonstration.
Democratic Reps. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut are scheduled to address the rally, along with Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, and survivors of cancer, AIDS, diabetes, heart disease and other serious illnesses.
Annual federal funding of the National Institutes of Health, the Bethesda, Md.-based agency that finances most medical research in the country, has flat-lined at about $30 billion since 2010, which means that inflation-adjusted spending fell by 6.3 percent in that period. The forced cuts of 5.1 percent will trim an additional $1.5 billion this year, with effective funding down 11.4 percent.
The National Cancer Institute, the largest of NIH's 27 centers, gets about $5.1 billion a year, or more than one-sixth the total NIH funding. It stands to lose $260 million this year because of the forced budget cuts, enough to finance the work of 575 scientists and lab technicians. Ninety percent of its budget is spent on research.
NIH research grants, which go to hundreds of universities, hospitals, pharmaceutical firms and other recipients across the country, range from $100,000 to $15 million, with the average grant at $450,000.
William Nelson, director of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, said he'll join the protest march to help ensure that the nation's brightest young minds don't abandon science for lack of support.
Nelson said many post-doctoral researchers and other young scientists are encountering greater difficulties in obtaining grants than more seasoned peers because their track records are less extensive.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Spying software reportedly snooped on companies, governments, individuals since 2008
- Even before Ebola contained, U.S. looks to next health crisis
- Graham rejects GOP Benghazi report as ‘garbage’
- Obama defends executive action on illegals
- E-cigarettes cut cravings, study finds
- D.C. charges woman over armed protest
- Former Wounded Warrior leader removed from Department of Defense employment
- U.S. to arm Iraq’s Sunni tribesmen
- 3-mile buffer suggested for grouse breeding, oil and gas drilling
- Plan in works to speed up schools’ Internet service
- Vote on Keystone XL pipeline hangs in balance