Republican-controlled Ohio House to buck Kasich, drop Medicaid expansion
COLUMBUS, Ohio — A Republican-controlled legislative panel will drop Gov. John Kasich's proposal to expand the Medicaid program from the state's two-year budget plan, The Associated Press has learned, as advocates for extending the health care coverage to thousands more low-income Ohioans prepared to rally against the move.
A person with knowledge of the budget negotiations confirmed to the AP on Monday that House lawmakers will strip the idea from their version of the state spending blueprint. The person requested anonymity because the information had not yet been made public.
The House version of the Republican governor's $63.2 billion, two-year spending blueprint is expected to be introduced Tuesday afternoon by the chamber's budget-writing committee.
The House Finance and Appropriations Committee is expected to include $50 million per year for mental health and addiction services, the person said.
House lawmakers were expected to strip a tax increase on oil and gas drillers and sales taxes on professional services out of Kasich's budget and to significantly rewrite his proposed school-funding formula.
The Medicaid expansion is one of the key components of the federal Affordable Care Act. Of the nearly 30 million people expected to gain insurance coverage under the law, about half would get it from the Medicaid expansion. A Supreme Court ruling allowed states to decide for themselves whether to expand the program.
Kasich in February proposed going forward with expansion, contending that Medicaid expansion was the way for the state to recapture Ohio taxpayers' federal money to provide medical care for those who were most vulnerable.
About 366,000 Ohio residents would be eligible for health coverage under the expansion beginning in 2014.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Cedar Point attraction mishap injures 2 riders
- Data on impact of Colo. gun law, background checks questioned
- Lawmakers say answering Census survey should be voluntary
- Cellphone users can soon declare freedom from wireless carriers
- Gun advocates chalk up 2nd win this year with D.C. ruling
- Lightning strikes 14 in Calif., leaves 2 critically hurt
- Tentative deal reached on VA reforms
- Trial to begin for video in Oklahoma City bombing
- U.S. coal exports undermine clean air efforts, experts say
- Automatically renewing Obamacare plans may backfire