Immigration bill to boost security on all of border with Mexico
WASHINGTON — Bipartisan immigration legislation being written in the Senate would require surveillance of 100 percent of the border with Mexico and apprehension of 90 percent of people trying to cross the border in certain high-risk areas, a person familiar with the proposals said on Wednesday.
People living here illegally could begin to get green cards in 10 years, but only if a new southern border security plan is in place, employers have adopted mandatory electronic verification of their workers' legal status and a new electronic exit system is operating at airports and seaports.
The person provided the information on condition of anonymity because the deliberations are private.
The contours of the tough new border security plans emerged as senators moved closer to presenting sweeping legislation within days that would put some 11 million immigrants living here illegally on a path to citizenship and would allow tens of thousands of high- and low-skilled workers into the country on new visa programs, in addition to securing the border.
Lawmakers and aides said all the major elements were complete or nearly so. A final deal was pending on a new visa for agriculture workers, and there were small details to be dealt with on visas for high-tech workers, but Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said it was not enough to hold up the bill.
“We are closer now than we have been in 25 years for serious immigration reform,” Durbin told reporters on Wednesday after he and other Democrats in the Senate negotiating group briefed members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. “This president is behind it, and there is a strong, growing bipartisan effort in the Senate to support it. We hope that the House will do the same.”
Meanwhile, tens of thousands of pro-immigration activists massed outside the Capitol and in cities across the country to push Congress to act. They waved American flags and carried signs reading, “Reform immigration for America now!”
The border security piece of the legislation is critical to getting support from Republicans, but some Democrats have opposed making a path to citizenship contingent on border security. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the new requirements would not impede citizenship.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. clears police officer in Ferguson case, criticizes police force
- Feds raid ‘maternity hotels’ in Ca.
- Oil spill in Washington river endangers wildlife
- Ferguson’s white officer justified in shooting black man, feds find
- Alabama Supreme Court defies federal judge’s ruling
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules
- Defense strategy for Boston Marathon bombing defendant Tsarnaev is to avoid death penalty
- Congress investigates Hillary Clintons use of private email