TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Cyberattacks bill moves in House

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Wednesday, April 10, 2013, 7:30 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — A House panel voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday in favor of a new data-sharing program that would give the federal government a broader role in helping banks, manufacturers and other businesses protect themselves against cyberattacks.

The bill, approved 18-2 by the House Intelligence Committee, would enable companies to disclose technical threat data to the government and competitors in real time, lifting antitrust restrictions and giving legal immunity to companies if hacked, so long as they act in good faith. In turn, companies could get access to government information on cyberthreats that is often classified.

It's a defiant move by pro-business lawmakers who say concerns by privacy advocates and civil liberties groups are overblown.

But even while the panel's approval paves the way for an easy floor vote next week, the legislation has yet to be embraced outside the Republican-controlled House. Last year, a similar measure never gained traction and eventually prompted a White House veto threat.

“We've struck the right balance,” said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the committee's chairman. “It's 100 percent voluntary. There are no big mandates in this bill, and industry says under these conditions they think they can share (information), and the government can give them information that might protect them.”

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, is widely backed by industry groups that say businesses are struggling to defend against aggressive and sophisticated attacks from hackers in China, Russia and Eastern Europe.

Privacy and civil liberties groups have long opposed the bill because they say it opens America's commercial records to the federal government without putting a civilian agency in charge, such as the Homeland Security Department or Commerce Department.

That leaves open the possibility that the National Security Agency or another military or intelligence office would become involved, they said. While the program would be intended to transmit only technical threat data, critics said they worry that personal information could be passed along, too.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
  2. Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
  3. Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
  4. $4.8M in gold taken in armored truck hijacking in North Carolina
  5. Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders
  6. EPA ripped for evading request for information
  7. Clinton portrait refers to Lewinsky scandal, Philadelphia artist says
  8. Several states in path of wintry blasts
  9. Supreme Court justices split on states’ panels to prevent gerrymandering
  10. Gag order challenged in W.Va. mine disaster case
  11. Republicans try to jump-start food stamp reforms