Obama's budget proposal to spend $300 billion, slash $1 trillion
WASHINGTON — President Obama introduced a 10-year budget blueprint on Wednesday that calls for nearly $300 billion in new spending on jobs, public works and expanded preschool education and nearly $800 billion in new taxes, including an extra 94 cents a pack on cigarettes.
But the president's spending plan would also cut more than $1 trillion from programs across the federal government — for the first time targeting Social Security benefits — in an effort to persuade congressional Republicans to join him in finishing the job of debt reduction they started two years ago.
“Our economy is poised for progress, as long as Washington doesn't get in the way,” Obama said in announcing his budget plan in the White House Rose Garden. He said his budget represents “a fiscally responsible blueprint for middle-class jobs and growth.”
His fiscal year 2014 budget replaces “the foolish across-the-board spending cuts” known as the sequester that are “already hurting our economy,” Obama said. The plan reduces the deficit and makes necessary investments “because we can do both,” he said. “We can grow our economy and shrink our deficits.
“The numbers work. There's not a lot of smoke and mirrors in here.”
Obama urged Republicans to show they are serious about deficit reduction by reforming the tax code to eliminate loopholes that benefit the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations.
“If you're serious about deficit reduction, then there's no excuse to keep these loopholes open,” the president said. “They don't serve an economic purpose. They don't grow our economy. They don't put people back to work. All they do is to allow folks who are already well off and well connected to game the system.”
He vowed that he would not “finish the job of deficit reduction on the backs of middle class families or through spending cuts alone that actually hurt our economy short term.”
Obama warned: “When it comes to deficit reduction, I've already met Republicans more than halfway.”
Congressional Republicans promptly attacked the plan.
“We don't need an extreme, unbalanced budget that won't balance in your lifetime or mine,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a floor speech before Obama's Rose Garden announcement. “It looks like there's less than $600 billion worth of reduction in there — and that's over a decade — all of it coming from tax increases. In other words, it's not a serious plan. For the most part, just another left-wing wish list.”
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said in a statement that he was “disappointed by the president's proposal because it merely ratifies the status quo.”
House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., said it was “overstuffed with spending and tax increases that will continue to hinder economic growth.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Scientists hope tiny robotic bee’s big dreams take flight
- Lighthouse sale draws $78K bid off cost of Portland, Maine
- Scathing report says college trustees fail in mission
- ISIS beheads American photojournalist who was kidnapped 2 years ago in Syria
- New rules for highly addictive, hydrocodone-containing medications near
- Medicare’s weak defenses against fraud evident in wheelchair scam
- Police say couple wanted Amish girls for slaves
- Don’t eat tuna, Consumer Reports tells mothers-to-be
- Some states say discrimination against sick creeping back under Obamacare
- Mortgage deal isn’t likely to cost $17B
- Law broken in Bergdahl hostage deal, GAO finds