Debt risks lurk inside fed budget
WASHINGTON — Buried deep in the Obama administration's four-volume budget released this week are long-term economic projections that underscore what could be steep costs for failing to get the nation's finances in order.
In the president's economic analysis accompanying the budget are forecasts over the next decade for everything from inflation and growth to unemployment and interest rates on government bonds. That last one is flashing trouble ahead.
The administration offered on Wednesday a rosier forecast for bond yields — what government pays to borrow — than that of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The White House sees the 10-year Treasury bond with a yield of 2 percent this year and 2.6 percent next year, about what the CBO foresees.
But as the economy hits its stride, that bond yield starts climbing. It hits 4.1 percent in 2017 and 5 percent in 2021, staying there through 2013 in the administration budget. The CBO predicts a rate of 5 percent in 2017 and then 5.2 percent for the next six years.
The gap between the two views might seem like an inconsequential fraction, but in reality, it's a huge difference. In either scenario, it'll cost more to borrow to pay off past debts, but if CBO is right, it'll cost considerably more.
The 10-year bond influences the borrowing cost Americans pay for a 15-year or a 30-year mortgage. More importantly, it reflects the interest rate the government will have to pay bond buyers if it hopes to incur new debts to pay off old ones. Think of it as having the interest rate go up on your credit card and having to borrow on that card to pay off what's already on the monthly statement.
“The administration has an incentive to assume that rates ––will go up later, because it keeps (borrowing) costs down,” said Roberton Williams, a veteran tax and budget expert for the centrist Tax Policy Center.
But if the CBO is correct, high borrowing costs will make it harder to deal with the U.S. debt, now more than $16 trillion and projected to soar past $25 trillion in 2023. Obama's spending blueprint envisions declining deficits that mean the debt load grows more slowly.
“Ultimately, policymakers will need to go beyond the proposals laid out in the president's budget in order to put the debt on a clear downward path as a share of the economy over the long term and to ensure that programs like Social Security and Medicare are fully funded for the next generation,” the advocacy group Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said on Thursday.
The administration projects interest on the debt will rise from $223 billion in the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 to $763 billion in 2023. That's an increase of 242 percent. The CBO forecast has interest on the debt rising to $857 billion by 2023, up about 282 percent over 10 years.
Obama predicts debt held by the public would decline as a share of the economy from 78.2 percent in the coming fiscal year to 73 percent in 2023. While a slight decrease, that's double the average of 35 percent from 1960 to 2008.
Budget watchdogs such as the liberal Center for Budget and Policy Priorities excoriated President George W. Bush for rising debt, but support Obama's providing it remains on a downward path.
“It's been, certainly, a very strange world since the financial panic, and (government bonds) have become the place for people seeking safety,” said Chad Stone, the group's economist.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Teacher tried to stop Washington state shooting
- 2 California deputies slain, suspect captured
- Seattle area school homecoming ‘prince’ guns down classmates
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Test confirms remains are missing Virginia student’s
- Philadelphia Mafia figure returned to prison for meeting friend
- WWII pilot takes off in B-29 yet again
- Teacher tried to stop school shooting