Military attempts to end Guantanamo Bay detainees' hunger strike
The military attempted to break a hunger strike at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, early Saturday when the detention center commander ordered an end to communal living conditions and returned the detainees, sometimes forcibly, to single cells.
“This action was taken in response to efforts by detainees to limit the guard force's ability to observe the detainees by covering surveillance cameras, windows and glass partitions,” said Navy Capt. Robert Durand, a spokesman for Joint Task Force Guantanamo. “Round-the-clock monitoring is necessary to ensure security, order and safety as detainees continued a prolonged hunger strike by refusing regular camp-provided meals.”
Durand said in a statement that some detainees “resisted with improvised weapons, and in response, four less-than-lethal rounds were fired.”
He said there were no serious injuries to guards or detainees.
The hunger strike began in early February after detainees said the guard force initiated aggressive sweeps of the cells that they alleged included inappropriate searches of the detainees' Qurans. The military acknowledged that Qurans were searched for contraband, but said they were handled only by interpreters, most of whom are Muslim, not the guard force.
Lawyers for the detainees, the military and the International Committee for the Red Cross agree that the hunger strike is also born of a deeper frustration that the Obama administration has abandoned any real effort to close the facility.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Still reeling from fire, FAA pushes changes
- Remains could be missing University of Virginia student Graham
- Election picture looks less predictable with Ebola, ISIS on the table
- Riots shake Keene State College in New Hampshire
- West Virginia University warns students over riots
- Panetta skipped CIA’s OK of book, potentially putting agency in delicate position with others
- Archaeologists sift through Everglades muck for history
- Maryland man set for trial in killing erroneously released
- Ex-NSA chief drops deal with former aide to avoid appearance of conflict