Pool exercise may build strength, reduce falls
Published: Monday, April 15, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
NEW YORK — Women who did a high-intensity aquatic workout for six months increased their strength and suffered fewer falls, in a new study that suggests bone- and muscle-building resistance can be achieved with the right kinds of water exercises.
“What we did was to test the model for muscle training in the gyms and put it inside the pools,” said lead author Linda Moreira, a researcher at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo.
The study should encourage postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporotic bone-thinning that pool-based exercise can increase muscle and bone strength, according to Moreira's team.
Aquatic aerobics became popular in the 1990s as a way for older people to exercise without straining their joints or being injured in falls.
However, aquatic exercise fell out of favor, experts said, because of concerns that the bone- and muscle-building benefits of resisting gravity in standard exercises were diminished when someone is buoyant in water.
To test a water workout Moreira's group designed to increase resistance and build strength, they recruited just over 100 inactive women in their 50s and 60s.
All the women took 1,000 international units of vitamin D3 and 500 milligrams of calcium daily — both vitamins known to help build bone and muscle — during the six-month study.
Half the women were assigned to an aquatic exercise program, which Moreira's group formed to combat osteoporosis by preventing falls and named HydrOS.
Instead of the more typical high-repetition, low-impact aqua aerobics, the HydrOS interval training included bursts of intense activity between 10 to 30 seconds at up to 90 percent of maximum heart rate. The water created the resistance that weights would provide on land, Moreira said.
Seven months later, the number of falls among aquatic exercisers had dropped 86 percent and the number of women who suffered falls dropped 44 percent. In the sedentary group, the number of falls remained unchanged, according to results published in the journal Menopause.
The researchers also found that flexibility plus hand, back, hip and knee strength increased in the aquatic exercisers. The women in the sedentary group showed mild increases in balance and strength as well, but the researchers attributed those improvements to the calcium and vitamin D supplements.
As people age, they lose muscles used for quick movements that stimulate bone health. But, according to Moreira, typical aquatic aerobics work muscles used for slower day-to-day movement.
“Physical instructors were training the wrong muscle type,” she said.
About a quarter of the study participants had osteoporosis, half were at the beginning stage of the bone disease and the remaining quarter had normal bones.
Very little is known about how water exercise can improve health in older adults, said Wendy Kohrt, professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. Kohrt was not involved in the current study.
“Without knowing what the benefits are, it's difficult to recommend water exercise; (the study) fills a gap in knowledge that is a pretty big gap,” she added.
“Improvements tended to be small (with the aquatic approach). It's a little difficult to judge just how effective this type of exercise program is,” Kohrt told Reuters Health.
Kohrt noted that one serious limitation of the study was that researchers did not use equipment that could maximize muscle resistance.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- White House flops: Obama knew uncle
- Officer convicted in teen’s shooting
- Illinois overhauls its public pensions, cutting benefits for most workers, retirees
- Georgia cops suspended for cussing out rowdy bus of schoolkids
- Snowy owls travel south