Insanity plea tossed in deaths of daughters
HUDSON, Wis. — A jury on Tuesday rejected an insanity defense by a Wisconsin father who admitted killing his three young daughters in July, ruling that the man had a mental defect but still understood what he was doing was wrong.
Aaron Schaffhausen, 35, could receive a life sentence at a sentencing hearing to be set later. Jurors deliberated for about 3½ hours before reaching their verdict.
He had earlier pleaded guilty in St. Croix County Circuit Court to three counts of first-degree intentional homicide and one count of attempted arson. But he had maintained that because of a mental illness he was not responsible for killing 11-year-old Amara, 8-year-old Sophie and 5-year-old Cecilia.
Evidence in the case showed Schaffhausen texted his ex-wife Jessica on July 10 to ask for an unscheduled visit with the girls. She consented but said he had to be gone before she got home because she didn't want to see him. The girls' baby sitter told investigators the children were excited when he arrived. The baby sitter left. He called his wife about two hours later, saying: “You can come home now, I killed the kids.”
Police arrived to find the girls lying in their beds, their throats slit and their blankets pulled up to their necks. White T-shirts were tied around their necks. Prosecutors said Schaffhausen did that to keep their blood off his own clothes as he put them in bed. Cecilia also showed signs of strangulation.
In his closing argument Tuesday, prosecutor Gary Freyberg told jurors that Schaffhausen was a manipulator who knew what he was doing and wanted to punish his ex-wife in the worst way imaginable.
“These children did not have to die. They died because their father made a choice,” he said. “He chose to kill them and betray everything that a parent stands for because he was jealous and angry.”
Defense attorney John Kucinski countered to jurors that Schaffhausen has a rare mental disorder, rooted in a deep dependency on his ex-wife. Kucinski said the only way Schaffhausen believed he could “solve” that problem was to commit suicide or homicide.
He cited a defense expert who testified the crime was a case of “catathymic homicide,” evident by months of unwanted fantasies or desire to kill his girls, followed by a violent act — then a feeling of relief.
“There is nobody involved in this case that deserves an iota of blame because they could not know how ill his mind is,” Kucinski said. “None of this is anybody's fault ... you just look at the guy and he doesn't look as sick as he is.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- Perdue defeats Kingston in Ga. GOP Senate runoff
- Cyber domain is next battleground, authors of 9/11 report warn
- Defiant Vietnam POW honored
- U.S. intel believes civilian plane might have been mistaken for Ukraine military aircraft
- Autistic twin men locked up in Maryland home
- HGH use on the rise in teens, survey finds
- VA nominee to demand ‘urgent action,’ he tells panel
- To fight crime, Chicago tries wiping away arrests
- ‘Slenderman’ attack victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous well wisher
- Explosion levels home in Central Texas; 3 hurt