Share This Page

Memories of 9/11 come racing back to doctor

| Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Dr. Moira Davenport, an emergency room physician at Allegheny General Hospital, finished running the Boston Marathon about 45 minutes before two bombs went off on Monday.

She was at the subway station when police announced an evacuation of the terminal.

“I lived in New York City for the Sept. 11 attacks, and it was a lot of very similar sounds and sights,” said Davenport, 41, of Shadyside. “All you can hear is sirens and helicopters.”

Instinctively, Davenport approached a police officer and identified herself as a physician, offering to help.

An officer took her to a medical tent, but officials wouldn't let her in. She wasn't carrying credentials that showed she was a doctor.

“It's horrible to have skills and not be able to use them,” said Davenport, who only had an ID bracelet with her name and emergency contacts. “It's frustrating when you're used to being on the front line.”

Davenport, who ran the Boston Marathon four previous times, returned to Pittsburgh on Tuesday.

“It turned into a memory I was not expecting,” she said.

Luis Fábregas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7998 or lfabregas@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.