Senate quashes gun control measures
WASHINGTON — Gun-control advocates led by President Obama suffered a huge setback on Wednesday as the Senate defeated a delicately crafted compromise aimed at strengthening background checks for gun buyers — and then proceeded to reject a ban on assault weapons and limits on ammunition clips.
The votes were a bitter reminder that winning even the most gentle of gun-control measures has a near-impossible path to winning congressional approval.
“All in all, this was a pretty shameful day for Washington,” a clearly irritated Obama said after the background check vote.
Gun-control backers thought this time might be different, that they could reverse the years of frustration getting gun-control legislation approved. The horror of the Dec. 14 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, in which a gunman killed 20 schoolchildren and six adults in Newtown, Conn., was never far from the minds of senators.
Victims of gun violence from Newtown, Tucson, Colorado and other sites of recent horrors watched the votes from the galleries. “Shame on you!” Patricia Maisch, a survivor of the January 2011 Tucson shopping center shootings, shouted as the Senate vote to reject the background check compromise was announced.
At the White House after the vote, Mark Barden, the father of a child killed at Sandy Hook, recalled how “we met with dozens of Democrats and Republicans, and shared with them pictures of our children, our spouses, our parents who lost their lives on December 14th. Expanded background checks wouldn't have saved our loved ones, but still we came to support a bipartisan proposal from two senators.”
The disappointment and anger were clear. Obama had a personal lobbying effort unlike any by a president since the Clinton administration. After the background check defeat, he went to the Rose Garden, flanked by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and Vice President Joe Biden, and put the blame for the defeat squarely on the gun lobby. Giffords was severely wounded in the Tucson incident.
“All that happened today was the preservation of the loophole that lets dangerous criminals buy guns without a background check,” Obama said.
“Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill. They claimed that it would create some sort of ‘big brother' gun registry, even though the bill did the opposite.”
In vote after vote in the afternoon, gun-control backers came up short of the 60 needed for passage.
The background check compromise sponsored by Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. and Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, got 54 votes. The assault weapons ban got 40, even after Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., pleaded with colleagues to “show some guts.” The effort to put curbs on ammunition clips got 46 votes.
The votes largely reflected geography. Senators from more rural, more conservative states sided with gun rights advocates. Senators with more urban constituencies backed gun control.
Gun rights supporters tried to get some changes to the bill, and those too failed. A bid to expand concealed-carry laws got 57 votes. An alternative to the background check compromise got 52.
Many had thought the tortured memory of Newtown would finally help win at least the background check effort.
“If tragedy strikes again — if innocents are gunned down in a classroom or a theater or a restaurant — I could not live with myself as a father, as a husband, as a grandfather or as a friend knowing that I didn't do everything in my power to prevent it,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
But conscience meant different things to different senators.
Reid's Nevada colleague, Republican Sen. Dean Heller, was viewed as a potential swing vote for the background-check compromise. He voted no.
“The onerous paperwork and expansion of federal power mandated in this legislation are too great of a concern,” he explained in a statement. “I believe that this legislation could lead to the creation of a national gun registry and puts additional burdens on law-abiding citizens.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- In 2005, Cosby said he got drugs to give women for sex
- Senante begins new debate on federal role for schools
- Maryland mother charged with leaving baby on roadside
- Texas wants its gold back in the state’s borders
- Police: No evidence of gunshot at Walter Reed hospital
- Obama vows to stick with current strategy against Islamic State
- Chicago father won’t cooperate with police in shooting death of boy, 7
- Disguise aids $75K robbery of Oklahoma Wal-Mart store
- Idaho wildfire destroys homes, prompts hundreds to evacuate
- Chesapeake Bay pollution plan approved
- Killing by illegal immigrant blamed on S.F. ‘sanctuary’ policies