Foodborne infections sharply on rise, CDC says
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, April 18, 2013, 6:48 p.m.
NEW YORK — Bacteria commonly linked to raw milk and poultry is causing an increasing number of food poisonings, health officials said on Thursday.
Cases of campylobacter grew by 14 percent during the past five years, a government study found.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report was based on foodborne infections in only 10 states — about 15 percent of the American population. But it is seen as a good indicator of food poisoning trends — the CDC refers to it as “the nation's annual food safety report card.”
Overall, food poisonings held fairly steady in recent years. There were no significant jumps in cases from most other food bugs, including salmonella and E. coli. But campylobacter rose and last year accounted for more than a third of food poisoning illnesses in those states and about a 10th of the deaths.
Health officials said it's not clear why campylobacter cases have increased, or which food or foods was the source of most of the added illnesses.
The study had another piece of bad news: There were jumps in illness caused by a group of bacteria called vibrio, which are associated with shellfish. There were fewer than 200 vibrio cases reported last year, but that's a 43 percent increase from about five years ago.
The CDC report focused on only nine types of food germs, and counted only cases that were lab confirmed. Investigators tallied about 20,000 such cases and 68 deaths in those 10 states. It compared 2012 statistics to reports in the years 2006 through 2008.
Many illnesses never get reported. The CDC estimates that as many as 48 million Americans get sick from contaminated food each year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Satanists want to build monument
- Feds curtail paper applications for health care law
- CMU grad, hiking accident survivor Ralston arrested in Colorado
- Fearful experiences passed on in mice families, study finds
- Air Force allegedly uses spy system of cadet informants to counter misconduct
- Gun permit tiff puts officials’ jobs in danger
- 44,000 Cuban migrants arrive in U.S. in fiscal year ’13
- United Auto Workers considers first dues hike since 1967
- Sandy Hook 911 calls fuel sensitivity debate
- Wind-power companies won’t face federal prosecution in eagle deaths
- Navy deems drone launch from submarine success