Conn. gunmakers protest governor's statements
By The Hartford Courant
Published: Sunday, April 21, 2013, 9:06 p.m.
HARTFORD — Connecticut's gun manufacturers are accusing Gov. Dannel P. Malloy of a hostile work environment and essentially driving them out of the state with comments they view as offensive.
The clash reached a flash point in early April when Malloy, a Democrat, said on CNN: “What this is about is the ability of the gun industry to sell as many guns to as many people as possible, even if they're deranged, even if they're mentally ill, even if they have a criminal record. They don't care.”
Those comments prompted outrage in the gun industry.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a Newtown-based trade association, wants an apology. And O.F. Mossberg & Sons, a North Haven gunmaker with 270 employees, said the comments were “slanderous” to its employees.
Mossberg, the oldest family-owned gunmaker in the nation, expressed displeasure in a letter from its general counsel, Joseph H. Bartozzi.
“To set the record straight, our company and our employees have gone on record at public hearings and with our elected legislators as stating that the single biggest thing this state can do to stop the criminal misuse of firearms is to prevent access to firearms by prohibited or other at-risk individuals,” Bartozzi wrote.
Malloy stood his ground. “The governor thinks about jobs and economic development 24 hours a day. However, on this particular issue, his focus is first and foremost on public safety,” his spokesman said. “The bill he signed into law will improve public safety and make Connecticut's communities and families safer. We hope the gun industry will join us in that effort.”
Bartozzi suggested that Mossberg could leave the state.
“At a time when we are being encouraged to move our manufacturing facility to any one of several states, your words have made us feel ... decidedly unappreciated.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- From prison to presidency, Mandela reformed South Africa, ended apartheid
- Georgia cops suspended for cussing out rowdy bus of schoolkids
- FBI: Russian diplomats lied to get U.S. benefits
- Snowy owls travel south
- Cleveland police, city face lawsuits in deadly chase