Boston blasts spur security changes for Ohio races
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, April 22, 2013, 7:42 p.m.
CINCINNATI — From bomb-sniffing dogs to uniformed military members and bag searches, runners will notice more security at major events in Ohio's four largest cities in the next month and indefinitely thereafter.
The changes are a result of the Boston Marathon bombings and a flurry of meetings between Ohio's race organizers, local police and federal authorities to review security plans.
Even as the shock and despair of the bombings was sinking in, race organizers knew they would need to rethink the way things have been done for years.
In Cincinnati, for example, runners at the Flying Pig Marathon on May 5, who have always been able to bring their own bags from home and check them in with event organizers, will have to use clear, race-issued bags or nothing at all, said Iris Simpson-Bush, executive director of the race.
Overall security will be more than doubled from past events and for the first time will include bomb-sniffing dogs and uniformed volunteers from the National Guard, Simpson-Bush said.
David Babner, race director for the Capital City Half Marathon in Columbus — expected to draw 14,000 runners — said his event on May 4 will use bomb-sniffing dogs for the first time and will increase the amount of officers at the event.
Similar efforts will be taken at Cleveland's marathon on May 19, said Jack Staph, executive race director.
“We're strengthening security at all levels,” he said. “We're not going to let terrorists or evil or bad people stop us from putting on something that is very good.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Feds to collect public comment on plan to permit cellphone service on airplanes
- Boehner’s rant brings budget deal
- Defense bill gets House OK, deals with sexual assault
- 52 unsafe bus lines closed in federal crackdown
- Plane crash kills Hawaii official in Obama’s ‘birther’ fuss
- ‘Affluenza’ not a viable defense in DUI deaths, psychologist says
- Mass. lawmaker takes seat, makes history
- House OKs slashing contractor salary cap nearly in half; Senate likely to follow suit
- Veteran accused oflifting peers’ IDs
- Colo. boy, 6, no longer guilty of ‘sexual harassment’
- Bipartisan Senate bill would put kibosh on pricey portraits