TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Outcry erupts over 1% pay raise for military

Daily Photo Galleries

By USA Today
Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 9:12 p.m.
 

Military families and their advocates are battling an Obama administration proposal to limit troops' pay raises to 1 percent in 2014, the lowest increase in half a century.

“We're sending the wrong message to the ones who have worked the hardest in our country by the multiple deployments and family separations,” said Michael Hayden, deputy director of government relations for the Military Officers Association of America.

White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden, no relation, said Obama is committed to “a sacred trust” with military members but needed to reduce the pay raise, partly to offset congressional refusal to cut spending on “outdated weapons systems.”

Elizabeth Robbins, a Pentagon spokeswoman, called the limit on pay increases a “tough decision.” But she said the Defense Department must pay for proper training and support, and “fair compensation that recognizes the sacrifices (troops) make for our country ... while adhering to the budget constraints.”

Pentagon officials briefing family representatives framed the 1 percent increase as a trade-off — “They believe servicemembers and families would be willing to give something on the size of pay raises to ensure funding for the mission,” the National Military Family Association explained to members.

This triggered angry questions from spouses, who asked whether this wasn't a false choice.

“We understand that funding training and readiness are vital to the servicemember and the Department of Defense, but why should something this important be an either/or?” says Joyce Raezer, executive director of the association.

Pentagon records show that a 1 percent increase would be the lowest since 1963, when there was no raise followed by a double-digit increase later that year. The second-lowest raise since then was in 2011 at 1.4 percent.

Military pay increases by law are now linked with private sector growth as reflected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employment Cost Index, an assessment that would call for a 1.8 percent increase in 2014, which advocates are seeking.

But the Pentagon is asking Congress to limit it to 1 percent and save $540 million. The Defense Department is also seeking to raise or establish certain fees in health coverage for retirees and military dependents, a savings of $1 billion.

Doubts were also raised by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., head of the Senate Armed Service Committee sub-panel that will examine the issue. “There are a lot of ways the federal government can cut costs and save money, but targeting salaries and benefits for our troops and civilian personnel should not be one of them,” she said on Wednesday.

Non-military federal workers have seen their pay frozen for three years and Obama exempted troops from the impact of sequestration furloughs.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
  2. Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
  3. Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
  4. West Virginia University expels 3 students for postgame misconduct
  5. Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
  6. Man shot from behind, Wecht’s autopsy finds
  7. Driver accused of pretending to be Ohio cop
  8. Missouri officials faulted by feds for ‘selective’ probe in police shooting death
  9. Defacements in national parks lead to outrage, probe
  10. Sen. Casey seeks to cut off benefits to ex-Nazis
  11. Suburban Detroit girl plotted to kill family, run off with boyfriend, police say
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.