ShareThis Page

U.S. experts believe Syria may have used sarin; experts ask for caution

| Thursday, April 25, 2013, 9:06 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Even as lawmakers pressed President Obama on Thursday to take more aggressive action in Syria, questions surfaced among experts and from within the federal government about the strength of the evidence showing that chemical weapons have been used in that nation's two-year-old civil war.

White House officials set off a fervor on Capitol Hill when they acknowledged for the first time that the United States had received some evidence that Syria's President Bashar Assad had used chemical weapons — the lethal nerve agent sarin in particular.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said that the conclusion had been made in the previous 24 hours.

“We cannot confirm the origin of these weapons, but we do believe that any use of chemical weapons in Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad regime,” he said. “As I've said, this is serious business. We need all the facts.”

But experts say the reports should be met with some skepticism because of the small amount of sarin that was found, the lack of widespread deaths and injuries and inconclusive intelligence assessments.

The intelligence findings were of “low or moderate” confidence, said an official who requested anonymity.

Another person familiar with the issue, who asked not to be further identified, said only a minuscule trace of a “byproduct” — a toxic residue left behind after use of a nerve agent, and which he did not identify — had been found in a soil sample.

“They found trace amounts of a byproduct in soil, but there are also fertilizers that give out the same byproduct,” the person said. “It's far from conclusive.”

Obama has long resisted significant involvement in Syria, despite repeated calls to help end the bloodshed in the war-torn country. But he has said repeatedly that the use of chemical weapons would trigger what he called a “red line” and lead to greater intervention.

So far, the United States has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to Syrians seeking to overthrow the Assad regime and has called on the United Nations to investigate the possible use of chemical weapons. That inquiry has been blocked by Assad.

“After two years of brutal conflict, it's past time for the president to have a robust conversation with the Congress and the American people about how best to bring Assad's tyranny to an end,” said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the disclosure “a game changer.”

Lawmakers of both parties are calling on Obama to provide a safe area for the opposition to operate, to establish a no-fly zone and to offer weapons to the resistance.

“It is clear that we must act to assure the fall of Assad, the defeat of extremist groups, and the rise of democracy,” said Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “We must do everything possible to prevent the regime's use of chemical weapons and to ensure those stockpiles are secure.”

Administration officials said that all options are on the table, but they cautioned that it is too early to judge whether the United States should get further involved. Information about the quantity of sarin and the injuries or deaths caused by it were not released, and administration officials raised questions about the chain of custody of physiological evidence.

Two of the world's leading experts on chemical weapons not privy to the details of the assessments urged caution.

Jean Pascal Zanders, a senior researcher at the European Union Institute for Security Studies, said that a video broadcast internationally showing the effects of the alleged attack doesn't necessarily comport with a sarin attack. He said it could represent a number of other problems, including drowning.

And there were other possible red flags in the video.

“Why only one person?” he said, referring to the video showing one patient it said was a victim. “Why do I find the hospital setting, again, unlike what I would expect in a case of chemical exposure? Why is the guy ‘foaming' in the hospital, considering the rapid action of sarin.” Zanders explained that without an antidote, death is possible within one minute after exposure to sarin.

After Hagel's statement, the White House released a letter to McCain and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who on Wednesday had asked Obama for information about Syria.

“Our intelligence community does assess with varying degrees of confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically the chemical agent sarin,” wrote Miguel Rodriguez, the White House's director of legislative affairs.

Earlier this week, U.S. officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry and White House spokesman Jay Carney, declined to say whether the United States agrees with three major allies — Israel, Britain and France — that Syria had used chemical weapons. They did an about-face on Thursday.

“We've seen the White House do a 180,” said Reva Bhalla, a Middle East analyst at Stratfor, a private global intelligence company.

Bhalla said the White House was under growing pressure to at least acknowledge its allies' findings.

There's no debate about whether Syria has a chemical weapons stockpile. International experts agree that the Assad regime is believed to have hundreds, if not thousands, of chemical agents.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.