TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Congress can't keep a grip on helium problem

By The Washington Post
Friday, April 26, 2013, 7:48 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — President Reagan tried to get rid of it. So did President Bill Clinton. This October, their wish is finally set to come true.

The Federal Helium Program — left over from the age of zeppelins and an infamous symbol of Washington's inability to cut what it no longer needs — will be terminated.

Unless it isn't.

On Friday, in fact, the House voted to keep it alive.

“Many people don't believe that the federal government should be in the helium business. And I would agree,” Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., said on the House floor Thursday.

But at that very moment, Hastings was urging his colleagues to keep the government in the helium business for a little while longer. “We must recognize the realities of our current situation,” he said.

The problem is that the private sector has not done what some politicians had predicted it would — step into a role that government was giving up. The federal helium program sells vast amounts of the gas to U.S. companies that use it in everything from party balloons to MRI machines.

If the government stops, no one else is ready. There are fears of shortages.

So Congress faces an awkward task. In a time of austerity, it may reach back into the past and undo a rare victory for downsizing government.

“If we cannot at this point dispense with the helium reserve — the purpose of which is no longer valid — then we cannot undo anything,” then-Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., said back in 1996.

Today, the program is another reminder that, in the world of the federal budget, the dead are never really gone. Even when programs are cut, their constituencies remain, pushing for a revival.

The helium program may skip the middle step and be revived without dying first.

“This sort of feels like the longest-running battle since the Trojan War,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. Wyden has written a Senate bill, similar to the one Hastings wrote in the House, to extend the helium program beyond October and then eventually shut it down.

The program at the center of this debate has its origins after World War I. Countries such as Germany were building sturdy inflatable airships. The U.S. military was worried about a blimp gap.

So Congress ordered a stockpile of helium to help American dirigibles catch up. It was assumed to be a temporary arrangement.

“As soon as private companies produce ⅛helium⅜, the government will, perhaps, withdraw?” asked Rep. Don Colton, R-Utah, in the House debate.

“That is correct,” said Rep. Fritz Lanham, D-Texas.

That was in 1925.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. University of Wisconsin researchers work to customize vegetables for specific uses
  2. New heart failure drug works much better than current treatment, study finds
  3. Cleveland welcomes server farms
  4. Mom charged in girl’s death in line for $1M from her trust fund
  5. Obama backs off immigration vow
  6. Some states say discrimination against sick creeping back under Obamacare
  7. GMOs: Science and skepticism
  8. Senate to look at earthquake risks at California nuke plant
  9. Female sergeant barricades self in Fort Lee building, commits suicide
  10. Rosa Parks items sell for $4.5M
  11. Revival of beer gardens in Milwaukee prompts other cities to consider it to shore up budgets
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.