'Tired' of running, inmate missing since 1999 surrenders in Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA CITY — After 14 years on the run from the FBI and tips from witnesses in two countries, David Lee Kemp turned himself over to authorities in southwest Oklahoma early Friday morning, local authorities said.
Kemp, of Lawton, Okla., was the only inmate to elude capture in an escape with eight other inmates in March 1999 while awaiting trial on in the killings of his ex-wife and her boyfriend.
Comanche County Sheriff Kenny Stradley said Kemp told police he was done running.
“He said that he was just tired basically of running and it was affecting his health,” Stradley said.
Kemp was taken into custody at 1:40 a.m. on charges of felony first-degree murder and escaping from a county jail, a misdemeanor.
The sequence of events leading up to his arrest started at a rest stop on Interstate 44, Stradley said, when Kemp knocked on the window of a sleeping truck driver.
“He said, ‘I need you to call Comanche County Sheriff's department to come up here. I need to talk to them,” Stradley said.
A deputy arrived, told Kemp he looked familiar and asked for Kemp's name. When Kemp told him, he was immediately arrested.
The bodies of Christina Cremer and her boyfriend, Robert Miller, were found in August 1998, riddled with bullets in their Lawton apartment. Kemp was apprehended by police in California days later and taken to Comanche County.
He and fellow inmates overpowered a guard with a large grilling fork. Most were recaptured the same day. Kemp was the subject of the “America's Most Wanted” and “Unsolved Mysteries” TV shows.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.