City in New York: No 'Don't Tread on Me' flag on public land
NEW ROCHELLE, N.Y. — A “Don't Tread on Me” flag hoisted by veterans outside a city-owned armory has been ordered down because of complaints that the defiant symbol of the American Revolution is now associated with the Tea Party and makes an unwelcome political statement.
Veterans in New Rochelle, just north of New York City, are threatening to sue, and a prominent conservative law firm has taken up the case. Some residents are upset with city officials, and a small town 60 miles away has raised the flag — with its coiled snake and yellow field — in solidarity.
“They shouldn't be able to tell us what flag we can fly,” said Peter Parente, president of New Rochelle's United Veterans Memorial and Patriotic Association.
But City Manager Charles Strome said: “They can fly whatever flag they want at the VFW post, at their own homes, but anything displayed on public property has to be determined by the municipality. .”
The veterans group had permission to take down a tattered American flag at the vacant New Rochelle Armory and replace it with a new one.
Parente said someone brought the “Don't Tread on Me” flag, also known as the Gadsden flag, to a sunset ceremony and the veterans decided to fly it.
Several flags bearing a rattlesnake and the slogan were used during the Revolution, according to the Naval History and Heritage Command website. The rattlesnake was a common symbol for the United States and its resistance to tyranny, and the first commander in chief of the Continental Navy used the Gadsden flag in 1776, it says.
Since at least 2008, the flag has been used as an unofficial symbol of the Tea Party, the loosely defined populist movement that supports reduced government spending, lower taxes and lowering the national debt.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- FBI blames North Korea for Sony hack
- NYC teenager a liar, not a penny stocks whiz worth $72M
- Computer hackers’ attack on Sony ‘merits an appropriate response,’ White House says
- New York move to ban fracking heartens critics
- Federal regulators pen rules for Cuba trade, tourism
- West Virginia man dies after being shot with arrow in Wellsburg
- Attorney General Holder, Justice Department target bias against transgender employees
- Congress’ legacy: Way worse than ‘do-nothing’ one of 1947-48
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Feds design college ratings system
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar