Manchin says he's reviving failed gun legislation
By From Wire Reports
Published: Sunday, April 28, 2013, 7:27 p.m.
WASHINGTON — One of the architects of failed gun control legislation says he's bringing it back.
Sen. Joe Manchin on Sunday said he would reintroduce a measure that would require criminal and mental health background checks for gun buyers at shows and online. The West Virginia Democrat says that if lawmakers read the bill, they will support it.
”The only thing that we've asked for is that people would just read the bill,” Manchin said on Fox News Sunday. “It's a criminal and mental background check strictly at gun shows and online sales.”
Manchin sponsored a version of the measure with Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Lehigh County. It failed.
Manchin said the bill failed because of “some confusion.” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was initially working on a more expansive background check bill, Manchin noted.
“We talked to Chuck and he backed off that, and we worked on what we thought was a much better bill, especially coming from a gun culture that I come from in West Virginia,” he said.
In the wake of last year's school shooting in Newtown, Conn., Congress took up gun control legislation, but it was blocked by supporters of the powerful pro-gun lobby, the National Rifle Association.
Polls have shown overwhelming public support for expanding background checks, and a new Quinnipiac poll released Friday shows that Pennsylvania voters think more favorably of Toomey for his leadership on the issue: As many as 54 percent of Pennsylvania voters said they think more favorably of him because of his work on the bill, while 12 percent think less favorably of him. Toomey's approval rating in the poll stood at 48 percent, his highest ever.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Upbeat Obama: 2014 can be ‘breakthrough’ year
- Judge strikes same-sex marriage ban
- Police say they thwarted attack at Colorado school
- Arizona county to settle 2 lawsuits against sheriff
- Couple ordered to stand trial in Craigslist killing
- Phoenix first city to end vets chronic homelessness
- Report doesn’t find sexual misconduct norm at agency
- Musician Fats Domino set to lead krewe during Mardi Gras
- More freedom granted to Hinckley
- Diplomat’s strip search part of U.S. due process
- 63 years on, missing POW’s remains returned to widow